Apple editor programmieren,simple free video editor software reviews,marketing mobile hairdresser business,internet marketing blog topics ideas - PDF Books

Gawker Media, which owns Gizmodo, published a statement saying the raid was unlawful because of journalistic protections. In an account posted on Gizmodo, Chen says he returned home from dinner to find police searching his house. Chen, who apparently has not been arrested or charged with a crime, says his door was kicked down as part of the search.
For background, you can find Gizmodo's account of how the blog acquired the unreleased iPhone here. That trade secrets statute states that you need to be employed by the principal or employer who owns the product.
Wow these guys from gizmodo either stumbled on a gold mine or are involved a growing publicity stunt for apple, in any case apple is going to get some serious press because time to buy upapple stock i think so! Just how much political power does apple have that they have the power to have govermental agencies do their bidding by illegially invading his home.
Maybe it is our Supreme Court at work, after all they struck down all the political reform laws, So maybe Apple is now buying judicial seats so they can expand their Apple Empire! First it was not the police that they were radid by it was The Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team (REACT), a Silicon Valley high-technology task force. If you don't, YOU and every other news outlet in the nation will end up being a FAX number that spews government propaganda. What's the big problem with the police taking Chen's computers and perhaps disassembling them? Also there is no law against buying lost property, its only stone had Gizmodo not attempted to find the original owner. Once Apple claimed the device and claimed original ownership, they should have offered Gizmodo a large sum of money to sign an NDA and return the phone.
If I find out that it was Apple that did this, I will sell all 3 of the iphones on my calling plan and never buy another apple product for myself or anyone else ever again.
Apple sits on the panel that runs this cyber crime task force in CA, so it's not just a police action gone amok. No one seems to take notice that Apple voluntarily allowed an employee to leave Apple corporate premises with a device that was worth millions. To those of you who think this is a publicity stunt by Apple, please seek professional help. To those of you who think a crime has not been committed, you may feel that way but the law is written differently. Whether or not the search warrant was legal, that is in fact separate from the crime of purchasing stolen material, which at this particular point seems to be what happened, Gizmodo has in fact plastered that fact all over their site. People keep saying that Chen and Gizmodo didnt know it was stolen, well they certainly wouldnt have offered that much money to something they were sure wasnt real.
If the guy in the bar who found it had done that in the first place, none of this would have happened.
After years as a MS guy, I have finally gotten used to Apple and was literally planing on going out to buy an iPad this weekend after spending last weekend online looking. I am surprised because most people who love Apple unconditionally also love the first amendment. I guess we all love the first amendment until that one time it doesn't make life easier for us.
Down deep, Apple is a big business and Steve Jobs is a neo-con just like all big businesses are.


Anyone who thinks Steve Jobs can just snap his finger and get the police to investigate and kick someone's door, jeez are serious? I know it to be true that the police and lawyers that approved the warrant did not even think that they were conducting an illegal search.
You will do what you want, but this happened, this raid, because the LOCAL POLICE realized there was something AMISS in this problem. Some of you say, oh, well the police has real criminals to chase after, but a geek in a tech gossip blog and all the others around him, have to also be investigated. Tech geeks are not some untouchable soc.ial tech-class that can getaway with breaking any laws. If you didn't like what WallStreet was doing, then you should also have an issue with GEEKS thinking they can evade and break laws or rewrite them.
You, who criticize Apple need to really think out your own values, you're illogical and overzealous about anything. At a snap of a finger YOU suddenly think that by stopping buying Apple products you will get one up on them. Sorry, purchasing an item that you know is not the legal property of that person is a crime. I love how the business fanboys try to use ethics and morales to attack people who do wrong against businesses, when business cannot abide by the same standard with consumers. Seems strange that if what Chen has done is so illegal, why hasn't he been charged with a crime yet?
Under California law, Apple has 3 years to claim their property before it becomes property of the finder. Hey, remember back in 1984 when Apple ran that ad proclaiming themselves the alternative to "Big Brother"? The question of whether the search and seizure was legal rests on whether the Gizmodo editor is considered a member of the press or a mere blogger. I think the police have every right to do what they did, that Gizmodo idiot obviously knew what he had and the fact that he exploited it on the website for media attention is probably one of the dumbest moves ever. The warrant makes specific reference to the unreleased iPhone 4 and gives police the authority to look for e-mails and other documentation related to the gadget. Chen works from home, so his house should be protected as newsrooms are, the statement says. Gizmodo has always been the epicenter for Apple fanboi cloning, then to have the company it so faithfully represents turn on them? IF these bozos paid someone to pick a developer's pocket, they deserve to get slammed.
YOU SHOULD BE SURROUNDING THE WHITE HOUSE, CAPITOL HILL, AND THE SUPREME COURT WITH JOURNALISTS AND DEMAND ANSWERS!
Our tax paid police force is not Apple's tool to use in investigating their own internal issues. This would be a really stupid and non-productive way to get attention for a device that already has enough buzz about it.. If you were at a bar and found a watch, wouldn't you turn it in to the manager so they could be contacted by the owner? STEVE JOBS COULD'NT EVEN GET THE LOCAL CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW HIM TO DEMOLISH THE OLD HOUSE HE OWNS. The stories were not adding up, there was probable cause to look into it and in order to outsmart tech-nerds like this, you have to move quick.


They can claim the information wanted to be free, and anyway it was asking for it dressing like that. Chen posted details about an unreleased, illegally obtained piece of technology, knowingly (operative word here) violating Apple's rights regarding trade secrets. If you read the story on the News site that posted it yesterday they have more info on this story. So what you are saying is, if you found, say a Motorola Droid, you would contact Motorola directly? Poll anyone who had their phone (or computer, or car, or purse, or lawnmower) and they will tell you that, no, the police should ALWAYS track down the criminals, barge it their home and take everything!
Suspected felons get arrested, police don't let them wander the streets freely while they attempt to build a case. Look at all of their computers, if you want it to be repair you have to take it to a Apple speicalist, where a regular PC basically almost anyone can fix. You certainly don't pay $5000 to receive stolen goods, take the thing apart and write a story. The DA has not even been involved yet the task force that is handling this looks at the basic theft but by posting the info that Gizmodo did they also broke a few laws that they wont be able to hide behind the freedom of the press. Thats why PC is more prono to attacks because more SMARTER people us PC, than Macs which is over price paper weights. Steve Jobs doesn't have an influence on the DA and the police any more than you and me. If they buy stolen property, they are only liable for the item and the police ASK for the information reguarding the person who SOLD it to them. They knew the name of the engineer who lost the phone (from the Facebook app on the phone).
Gizmodo determined that they believed that it was truely a stolen phone, and purchased it for $5000.
Second, even if the original finder was incapable of returning the phone, Gizmodo wasn't, and should have returned it immediately and without charge. Without having the appreciation for horology and the understanding of the art of watchmaking, not many of them (or us) would understand why a mechanical watch could cost up to $10,000 when the only thing it does (in general) is to tell time. If you look atthe item as stolen property, well didnt Chen ask apple if it was theirs and they said "uhhh hmmm not possible, must be fake",?
How can police justify "his computers were used to commit a felony" if LEGALY speaking, there wasnt one? Except in this case of course, since apparently this particular police force is in Apple's pocket. He asked apple it if was theirs, they said no, so of course he wants to fool around with it and do what ever he wants with it, if he bought property, legaly it is his. Apple pretends to be for the consumer, and they do a great job of convincing a handful of morons exactly that, but make no mistake Apple is just another greedy power hungry corporation. Do you intend to buy it?We waved our photoshop magic wand to create the above pictures of editors and bloggers wearing Apple Watch, of course.
HAHA Bret Seifert Well the post must’ve been edited after my post, because that disclaimer was not there before.



The affordable internet marketing course
Content marketing company india ltd



Comments to «Apple editor programmieren»

  1. JAGUAR writes:
    Combining print material with the stickiness of video and.
  2. Bakinka_111 writes:
    Most PC's and permits students.