Simple love spells to get your lover back,how to ask if your boyfriend is cheating on you,the ex boyfriend song lyrics ally cupcake - Videos Download

admin | Want My Ex Back | 08.11.2013
He then states the result of being clothed with the house from heaven that he so greatly desired.
Scattered among the letters which he addressed to the churches are a few verses that almost seem to contradict what he wrote in other epistles.
His language has been understood by many to teach that the reward of the righteous is bestowed at the moment of death and that an immortal soul leaves the body to face an immediate reward or punishment.
This is also established by the repeated references to the a€?nakeda€? or a€?unclotheda€? state.
To both the Corinthians and the Romans, Paul emphasized that the Spirit was a pledge that they would be clothed with immortality. In either case, whether by translation or resurrection, he would be a€?clothed upona€? with the immortal body.
He could not be a€?forever with the Lorda€? until that change took place a€?in the twinkling of an eye.a€? The interim sleep of death in the grave held no appeal for Paul, since it would seem but a fractional second of utter oblivion to the one who died. Some have attempted to interpret this text as though Paul said he wanted to depart and be with Christ immediately, but the word immediately is not in the scripture.
We have found from other scriptures that his expectation centred on the resurrection or translation of the body.
If there is any other way of getting to be with the Lord, then Paula€™s language is a stupendous falsehood. As we have just noted from 1 Thessalonians 4:16,17, Paul knew of only two ways to be with the Lorda€”by translation or resurrection. The alternatives that drew him were either a€?to livea€? or a€?to die.a€? He was a€?in a straita€? between these two. He described it as a€?having a desire to depart and to be with the Lord, which is far better.a€? Better than what?
If so, they were able to see him a€?as he isa€? at that very moment, and they would already be changed into the a€?likenessa€? of Christ.
Even though his departure in death was a€?at hand,a€? he did not expect to be with Christ immediately. If this is the true meaning of Paul's words, we are faced with some serious inconsistencies within the epistles. We can be certain, then, that the unclothed state did not involve being with the Lord, since Paul did not desire it.

He is simply contrasting the present life with the far more glorious life to come in heaven. His chief hope seemed to centre upon being translated without ever being a€?unclotheda€? in death. Either mortality would be a€?swallowed upa€? by being translated or death would be a€?swallowed upa€? by being resurrected. Looking beyond the uninviting nakedness of death to the land of life, Paul ruled out any possibility of a state between death and the resurrection when disembodied spirits could be present with the Lord. Other passages further clarify without any equivocation when the great apostle expected to be with Christ. The cause of God on earth drew him here, but he was weary from beatings, stonings, and bodily suffering. If we go to be with the Lord by means of our immortal spirit when we die, then we do not go to be with Him by means of the visible coming of Jesus, the resurrection of the dead and the change of the living. If he lived, Christ would be magnified, and if he died a martyra€™s death, the cause of Christ would be magnified. He expected it a€?henceforth.a€? The crown of immortality was a€?laid up for me,a€? he said.
Let us examine the verses in 2 Corinthians 5:1-8 and discover what Paul actually did teach on this crucial subject. In fact, the apostle made reference to being clothed with only two houses, the earthly and heavenly.
If the soul inhabited that heavenly a€?housea€? immediately at death, what happens when it must inhabit the immortalized body after the resurrection takes place? This verse provides undeniable proof that the indwelling Spirit is a guarantee that our mortal bodies will be quickened at the resurrection. He yearned to a€?be clothed upona€? by translation at the coming of Jesus, so that he be not found a€?nakeda€? (in the grave). Paul answers that we might enjoy a state of being in which a€?mortality is swallowed up of life.a€? Is that condition the separate existence of an immortal soul? Again, we are reminded of Paula€™s overwhelming desire to be translated without passing through the a€?unclotheda€? state of death. He would receive it a€?in that daya€? with others who would a€?love his appearing.a€? Surely, those of us living today should anticipate that same glorious appearing when we too shall receive, with Paul, the crown of righteousness, which fadeth not away.

Is it a proof or assurance that we have immortal souls that will live on when the body is dead? So evenly balanced were the influences drawing him in both directions that he hardly knew which course he preferred. There is no possible way of avoiding this conclusion, except by claiming that the descent of the Lord from heaven, the mighty shout, the trumpet, the resurrection of the dead, and the change of the living, ALL TAKE PLACE WHEN A PERSON DIESa€”a position too absurd to be considered. This would involve those souls leaving the a€?house eternal in the heavensa€? which they inhabited at death, and going into the redeemed bodies at the resurrection. Verse 23 answers, a€?a€¦ we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.a€? Paula€™s earnest expectation and hope was for the time when his body would be redeemed. Nevertheless, he said it was more needful for the church that he remain here to give them the benefit of his counsel and labor. To be a€?unclotheda€? or a€?nakeda€? is the condition of death that is the interlude between the dissolving of the earthly house and putting on the heavenly. It is either a body on this earth and being absent from the Lord, or it is a redeemed body in heaven and being present with the Lord. Goda€™s purpose in making man would have been realized without death taking place, and the idea of an immortal soul would never have existed.
The apostle makes it abundantly clear that the Spirit is a pledge of the redemption of our bodies at the resurrection.
Surely no one could believe that God a€?wrought usa€? for the a€?selfsamea€? purpose of sinning, dying and leaving the body in some invisible soul form. Moreover, this view introduces something that Paul never mentioned; for here we have THREE HOUSES, but Paula€™s language allows for only TWO. At death the body, which is mortal, does not become immortal, but loses all its life and crumbles back to dust in the grave. There is not as much life afterward as there was before, because after death only the soul lives, while the body which was alive before, is now dead.

How to make her fall back in love with me again
How to get your ex boyfriend who has a girlfriend back wikihow
Make new friends and keep the old one is silver and the other gold song

Comments »

  1. AmirTeymur — 08.11.2013 at 11:14:19 Start a dialog on a non-intrusive, friendly the people consider black eyes this may not be simple to hear.
  2. Alisija — 08.11.2013 at 20:14:53 Destroyed your relationship crop up again.
  3. BaTyA — 08.11.2013 at 20:45:12 Has handed because the break up and you off with me and he or she nonetheless.
  4. warlock — 08.11.2013 at 21:13:20 Touch along with your there's very.
  5. RAP_BOY_cimi — 08.11.2013 at 13:54:40 The affair was lacking in lots.