Under the Fair Share Tax Proposal, total government taxes (revenues) as a percent of GDP would be increased by about 10% from 2001-2010 levels back to where they were during the Clinton years.
Combining the Fair Share Tax Reform with all the Spending Reforms below would allow elimination of the federal deficit by 2025.
This year the our governments spent about $760 billion on healthcare (Medicare, Medicaid, and Chip).
Full annual benefits, starting at age 70 would be $18,000 for all unmarried persons or $30,000 for a married couples. The above change in benefits would be delayed until 2024 and then phased in over 10 years, to give workers the opportunity to adjust fund their tax-free accounts and otherwise adjust their retirement planning accordingly. Under the Fair Share Tax Plan, the regressive and indirect current payroll (Social Security) taxes are ended. Below are selected federal government spending cuts derived from the Simpson-Bowles report as described at the New York Times website.A  I have selected the spending cuts that look sensible to me and excluded those that are already covered under the spending cuts outlined above. Many economists argue that farm subsidies distort the workings of the market and largely flow to big agricultural businesses. In the past decade, both the number of federal employees and the number of contractors rose. The chairmen called for a series of smaller cuts, including eliminating some agencies, cutting research funds for fossil fuels, reducing funds for the Smithsonian and the National Park Service, eliminating certain regional subsidies, and eliminating the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools.
The costs of the disability insurance program, which is administrated by the Social Security Administration, have been rising rapidly.
Some economists believe that the Consumer Price Index overstates inflation, giving Social Security recipients larger cost-of-living increases than necessary.
Over the last 30 years federal non-discretionary spending as a percent of GDP has been cut in half to about 2.5% of GDP.
The biggest threats to state and local government budgets are that there areA over-generous salaries, benefits, and retirement plans for some government workers. State and local governments should improve public education, especially in the worst schools. Under the Fair Share Tax Reform, total government taxes (revenues) would be increased about 10% (as a percent of GDP compared to the 2001-10 period, under the Bush tax cuts), although taxes on the typical taxpayer (in fact, the bottom 80%) would be reduced substantially. The proposed Spending Reforms below, once mostly implemented (after 2020), reduce total government spending by about 18% below current levels (the 2001-10 period), to on average 17.0% percent of GDP. If the Fair Share Tax Reform was joined with the Spending Reforms proposed below on this page, our National Debt would start to drop (as a percent of GDP) immediately and could be entirely paid off by 2040. CLICK HERE to see the spreadsheet with the calculations that produced the chart below for the Federal Budget.
A bit of history: President Clinton's tax increases - which had the wealthy pay something closer to their fair share - balanced the federal budget and produced our first federal surplus in decades.
FAIR SHARE TAX REFORM - A comprehensive tax reform plan for federal, state and local governments, that reduces total taxes on the working-poor and middle-class by thousands each year, encourages stable economic growth, vastly simplifies our tax laws, and slashes the national debt. They are used to create the above graph and the accompanying Government Budget Spreadsheet page.


When President Eisenhower, former Supreme Allied Commander during World War II, left office during an earnest Cold War with a nuclear-armed industrial giant committed to our destruction, we were spending 50% less on the military (adjusted for inflation). Health-care spending per person in Japan and the western Europe is about half of what we pay here, AND they have better outcomes with better life expectancies (link, link).
If a small part of that was invested in the taxpayer's simple tax-free account (for education and retirement; established automatically for all employees, with an opt-out provision), then almost all workers would retire in great shape. It would reduce projected Social Security spending by about $115 billion (about 4%) when completely phased in and going forward. The values listed are the expected savings for 2015 if the cuts were enacted and total $124 billion for that year.
As the Congressional Budget Office has noted, advocates of reducing the subsidies argue that doing so a€?could help small farms indirectly, slowing the ratea€? of consolidation.
Would also reduce the number of Minuteman missiles and funding for nuclear research and development, missile development and space-based missile defense. This option would cut disability spending by 5 percent by focusing on states with the loosest standards. This option would use a different, lower inflation measure both for Social Security and in the tax code (thus pushing more households into higher brackets over time). Non-discretionary spending funds things like basic science research, road and railways, environmental protection, sustainable energy research, education, and job training - all critical to future economic growth.
Thus, two dollars of spending would be cut for every dollar in total tax increases under the proposed Fair Share Tax Reform. On that page you can download the spreadsheet and see how the National Debt changes if you change tax rates and shift budget priorities. Reform of government expenditures - using that tax income sensibly - is also critical to the future of our nation. The proposed spending cuts, once fully implemented, would reduce total government spending (federal, state, municipal), measured as a percent of GDP, by almost 20% compared to average 2001-2010 levels.
Despite the revenue increases, taxes on the typical taxpayer (in fact, the bottom 80%) would be reduced substantially. He warned against the defense industry hijacking government in his Military-Industrial Complex farewell address.
Within the United States, around the the city of Seattle and at the Mayo Clinic, they spend about 30% less per Medicare patient than the national average, AND have better results.
Social Security could be viewed as a safety net to assure that no-one who contributed to the economy over a lifetime lives their retirement years in poverty. Early initiation of Social Security benefits, as early as age 60, reduces annual benefits. Eligibility for full benefits would require 40 years of filing a tax return with an income corresponding to at least full-time work at the minimum wage (during the transition, payment of the a€?olda€? Social Security payroll tax would count as a year toward the 40) OR a lifetime declared income of $6 million (in 2014 dollars) with at least 10 years of filing an at-least-minimum-wage tax return. Supporters note that growing numbers of workers are classified as disabled, though the average job is less physically taxing.
The American Society of Civil Engineers has given the nationa€™s infrastructure an overall grade of D.


Governments must honor commitments already made but should request give-backs (eg to avoid layoffs) where appropriate.
The Spending Plan includes a 20% increase beyond inflation in state and municipal education spending phased in over 5 years. Alternatively, we could drive the National Debt down to 40% of GDP and cut working-poor and middle class taxes even more substantially starting in about 2030. Early initiationA  of Social Security benefits, as early as age 60, reduces annual benefits.
The Republicans then cut taxes on the wealthy, started running up the national debt, and we now have the worst economy and bleakest employment prospects in 80 years.
We are now spending more than FIVE times that spent by the next most militarized country, China.
Some regions spend twice as much per Medicare patient as do other regions and have worse results. If we wish to save this nation from economic disaster, we simply need to end the unrestrained and wasteful transfer of taxpayer money to the military-medical-industrial complex.
Partial benefits are prorated down to 25% benefits for 10 years of at-least-minimum-wage work (or $1.5 million lifetime declared income with at least 5 years of filing an at-least-minimum-wage tax return). Opponents say it is less accurate for the elderly, who buy a different mix of goods and services than other households. To ensure future economic prosperity, the federal government's spending on infrastructure, research, and the environment should be tripled and 150 billion added to federal education spending.
Going forward, statute should limit total compensation to those available for equivalent work in the private sector. Physician incentives to profit more from every test and procedure they prescribe must be blunted. Together this would cost an extra 380 billion in 2014 and further increased 2% beyond inflation each year going forward.
States pay about one-third of all Medicaid costs and should realize similar savings on those expenditures. All this additional spending is included in the pay down of the national debt pictured at the top of this page.
My calculations phase in the 30% cut over 5 years and phase out spending on the Iraq an Afghanistan wars over the same period.
Further, often the procedures are done in centers that the physician owns, so he gets both the hospital fee and procedure fee. Where possible, the decision to test or treat should be made by one physician who does not profit from that decision. Perhaps more physicians need to be paid with generous annual salaries, rather than per test and operation.



Free at home nail technician courses
Free promo codes for knotts berry farm zombies
How to make website in xhtml




Comments to «How to create free website for lifetime warranty»

  1. Arzu_18 writes:
    Higher worth lady in the area, even.
  2. NightWolf writes:
    Adjust your voice that will either support or hinder teeth.
  3. KOMBATin_dostu writes:
    I was a talkative kid, often receiving in problems some guidelines time at all, if I needed to go back out.


2015 Make video presentation adobe premiere pro | Powered by WordPress