It is evident that computer-mediated communication (CMC) has become very common in work life.
Taking these differences into consideration it is obvious that some of these characteristics may have certain advantages that can make life at work easier, where other ones may complicate the communication process. In order to give an overview the field of e-mail communication and organizational life, electronic searches were conducted, supplemented by publications collected through the professional network. The databases included were PsychInfo, Business Source Premier and web based databases like Google Scholar. We included studies that (1) handled the subject of e-mail communication in general, (2) had an interaction setting, preferably a focus on organizational communication, (3) had a focus on mobile technology, and (4) were identifiable as organizational psychological, social psychological and behavioral in nature. The paper starts with a brief discussion of the core assumptions of the JD-R model, subsequently we devote attention to the advantages and setbacks of e-mail at work, the individual differences in experiencing e-mail between sender and receiver, and, finally, we explore what the impact is of the increased mobility of employees facilitated by smartphones. The JD-R model states that two different processes play a role in the development of motivation and job strain.
Computers in general and Internet in particular was once developed to make our life easier and in the workplace it is considered as a facilitator of organizational goals.
Walther, Loh and Granka (2005) show that there are two prevailing positions with respect to this issue.
The other position holds that people adapt to the medium by imbuing verbal messages with contextual and stylistic cues, information about attitudes, emotions, and personal characteristics allowing for normal relational communication to build up. When e-mail first was introduced, people thought it was impossible to have other interactions than the exchange of short task-oriented messages. This finding may have dramatic consequences for e-mail communication in intra- and inter-organizational settings. Another type of ambiguous communication in a task-oriented setting is the exchange of feedback messages. The space between the sender of the feedback (manager) and the receiver (employee) is regulated by the context of the interaction and by the history of the relationship between the two (Lave, 1993). In conclusion, we can argue that delivering negative feedback can be stressful and unpleasant for both the sender and the recipient. However, cultural norms in organizations today still favor delivering bad news in a personal F2F conversation (Sussman & Sproull, 1999).
It is interesting to see how feedback can be an important resource in stimulating growth and development in employees and at the same time, when feedback is negative, as a significant demand for the manager who has to deliver it. Another characteristic of e-mail is that it invites the sender to engage in short and shallow messages (Bertacco, 2007; Bertacco & Deponte, 2005). When e-mail was introduced on the work floor, it not only replaced part of the F2F communication but it also generated an increase in communication overall (Contractor & Eisenberg, 1990; Culnan & Markus, 1987). Tele-working involves work away from the office via telecommunication equipment (telephone, CMC etc.) (Mann, Varey, & Button, 2000).
A new development in digital media is the increasing use of smart phones in business today. E-mail is not a new communication medium but the wireless e-mail systems facilitated by a smartphone enable users to engage in e-mail in new ways.
One of the selling arguments of mobile technologies is that they provide anytime, anywhere connection (Green & Harvey, 1999). Organizations provide smartphones to their employees to raise the flexibility of employees and to increase productivity and communication efficiency. Frequently using a smartphone contributes to a blurring of the boundaries between work and leisure time.
Research has shown that recovery is closely related to well-being (Sluiter, Van der Beek, & Frings-Dresen, 1999) and necessary to prevent an ongoing deterioration in mood and performance in the long run (Meijman & Mulder, 1998). Since the primary function of a smartphone is to send and receive e-mail anytime, anywhere, Allen and Shoard (2005) explored the impact of mobile technologies on the users’ experience of information overload. In sum, the quick access to information can have motivational potential for dealing with work, but when there is too much information (especially unrequested) coming your way, this can be a stressful experience of loss of control. Mazmanian and colleagues (2006) identified two type of responders: those who responded as soon as they received an e-mail (constant responders) and those who delayed their responses to some later time when a number of messages had accumulated (batched responders). Another paradox associated with mobile technology and related to opportunities for recovery is that a smartphone can be engaging and disengaging at the same time (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005). A research question that should be addressed in future research is whether a smartphone is primarily a facilitator in work that makes life at work easier and eventually contributes to work engagement. This overview intended to bring together the research areas of traditional e-mail communication, mobile e-mail and the JD-R model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner, & Schaufeli, 2001).
Altogether, we can conclude that there is no straightforward answer to the question what the impact of (mobile) e-mail communication on organizational life is.
The main reason for organizations to provide smartphones to their employees is to increase their communication efficiency and to raise their flexibility.
Future research is needed to examine the long-term effects of intensively using a smartphone on need for recovery, work-home interference, job performance, and employee well-being.
The quick access to information is helpful in managing tasks and restricts the delay in work. Taken together, we can conclude that e-mail communication in itself is neither a demand nor a resource.
Burnout and connectedness among Australian volunteers: A test of the Job Demands-Resources model. Daantje Derks is assistant professor in Work and Organizational Psychology within the Institute for Psychology at the Erasmus University of Rotterdam (the Netherlands).
You probably start in the morning with a cup of coffee, greet your colleagues and then the inevitable happens, you log in on your computer. This paper aims to give an overview of research on the impact of (mobile) e-mail on work using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner, & Schaufeli, 2001) as a framework. The search was restricted to English-language papers, which were published from 1990 some classic studies excepted.
In the motivational process, job resources like opportunities for development, autonomy, and social support satisfy employees’ basic needs, including the need for autonomy and the need to belong. One position holds that the absence of nonverbal cues withholds interactants important information about attitudes, emotions and partners’ characteristics, resulting in a less sociable, relational, understandable, and effective communication.
Walther’s (1992) Social Information Processing (SIP) theory formalizes the latter position. In fact, this is likely to be a fertile ground for miscommunication and in particular not noticing that miscommunication. Not only because we apparently are not that good in communicating ambiguous messages, but mainly because we think that we are competent in doing this. Positive feedback is not that difficult to deliver because it usually makes the receiver happier. E-mail, and its relatively safe environment (McKenna, Green, & Gleason, 2000) might afford opportunities to deliver negative feedback without detailed information about the social context and the recipients’ immediate reaction (Sproull & Kiesler, 1986). Sending negative feedback messages over e-mail in order to increase honesty and accuracy is considered inappropriate and disrespectful. Business deals are closed by e-mail, and a major part of the communication even with colleagues in close proximity takes place online (Renaud, Ramsay, & Hair, 2006). Wicklund and Vandekerckhove (2000) argue that only speedy communicative media that are also limited in bandwidth, for example e-mail, would promote shallow communications.
Surprisingly, Sarbaugh-Thompson & Feldman (1998) found out that the increase in electronic mail did not offset the decrease in F2F and telephone interactions, producing a net decrease in overall communication in their population of organization members. Therefore, it is interesting to examine the balance between formal and casual communication among workers. Depending on a computer as the main communication tool with colleagues may have emotional impact on the employee. Mann and colleagues (2000) examined the emotional impact of home-based working on employees. A smart phone can also intrude into family life since you stay connected (literally) with your work during the evening hours. Mobile e-mail devices may affect social dynamics by enabling new forms of interaction and collaboration (Lyytinen & Yoo, 2002a; Pica & Kakihara, 2003).
The ability to stay connected expands into new settings and challenges regarding expectations of availability, responsiveness and coordination (Mazmanian, Orlikowski, & Yates, 2006). Expectations of always availability can normalize into the notion that employees should be online and accountable to others at any time and place (Green, 2001). The always on culture and its implication for managing the work and home domains is discussed in the next section. Higgins and Duxbury (2005) also conclude that mobile technology is not helping us to achieve work-life balance. It can lead to increased productivity, but that is often achieved at the cost of higher stress levels and lower employee satisfaction which in the long run can lead to impaired performance. Periods of rest from work, vacations and time off, are important in maintaining well-being at work (Eden, 2001) and result in a decrease in perceived job stress and burnout (Westman & Etzion, 2001). Their research examined the use of wireless devices by senior officers in the West Yorkshire Police.
The JD-R model states that particularly the combination of losing control and experiencing a higher workload because of the large amounts of information one has to deal with can be detrimental for both health and performance. For example, the continuous availability cited before can decrease work delays (quick access to information) which leads to increased organization. The latter group valued the asynchronicity of e-mail as many believed it afforded them with some control over when to respond. The smartphone generates a dynamic of extensive engagement with e-mail communication, but at the same time it also generates an attendant disengaging from face-to-face interactions and events occurring in physical proximity (Mazmanian et al., 2006).
Or, whether it has become an increasing demand and a facilitator of working long hours which may lead to burnout in the long run. We aimed to give an overview of research on the impact of (mobile) e-mail on work using the JD-R model as a framework. It is obvious that it has enriched and facilitated business today in a sense that is easy to exchange information by e-mail with other people regardless of time and location.
These mixed experiences with (mobile) e-mail in organizational life made us wonder whether e-mail communication is mainly considered as an important resource that facilitates our work and may facilitate work engagement. Renaud and colleagues (2006) argued that the costs of e-mail are disproportionally loaded on the recipient who constantly has to divide attention between e-mail and other tasks. This flexibility can give the employee more autonomy in work and an opportunity for a better work-life balance. Diary studies are useful to examine the causal effects of staying attached to work in the evening hours and its consequences for performance and well-being the next working day. Paper presented at the third European conference on computer-supported cooperative work, Milan, Italy. Since e-mail is still the most prevalent form of CMC in organizational life, we focus predominantly on e-mail communication. For many of us the latter simple action has become automatic behavior and we don’t even realize that this act is dominating the rest of the office day. And, in fact, the increasing use of mobile devices in business has given the experience of e-mail a new dimension.
Thus, we will use research to show which aspects of e-mail communication can be considered as demands and resources, and hence complicate or facilitate our working life. The key terms used in the search were quite diverse because the single terms on e-mail communication and organizational life were not sufficient to collect all relevant studies. Examples are a high work pressure, emotionally demanding interactions with colleagues or clients, and an unfavorable physical environment. Therefore, resources lead to high employee engagement and optimal organizational performance. However, what happens if one receives excessive amounts of e-mail and if all the senders expect an immediate answer?
The absence of social interaction is usually seen as a major determinant of the different social effects of CMC in comparison to F2F communication and has been at the root of several theories about the effects of CMC (Walther & Tidwell, 1995).
This theory explicitly rejects that the absence of nonverbal cues restricts the interactants’ capability to exchange individuating information.

The lack of nonverbal cues implies automatically that not all information is fully transferred (McKenna & Bargh, 2000).
For one thing, because everything has to be typed there is time to read over the message before it is submitted.
They argue that this overestimation is caused by egocentrism in that people find it very difficult to move beyond their own subjective experience of a stimulus and imagining how the stimulus might be evaluated by someone who does not share the privileged perspective (Kruger et al., 2005).
Feedback messages can be considered ambiguous because they have an objective, critical component, but also a motivational component in the form of constructive feedback. Media choice is also no issue, since positive messages are less ambiguous and more easily interpretable than negative messages. The mediated environment of e-mail communication might decrease the psychological discomfort of the sender during the communication process and as a consequence the feedback might be more straight and honest (Sussman & Sproull, 1999).
Perhaps that with the increasing amount of communication taking place in an online environment these norms will alter over time. For feedback to serve as an important resource it is important that it is constructive and well understood. Speed oriented communication gives an individual the sense that the recipient can be reached and dealt with quickly (Manger et al., 2003). This decline in volume might suggest that e-mail is more efficient in communication (see also, Rice & Case, 1983). Particularly because e-mail can contribute significantly to the workload caused by the increase in information and communication, it is important to maintain the level of resources. CMC results in a reduction in intimacy because of the inability to directly engage with your interaction partner and having to deal with the obstacles from the mediator (Kiesler, Siegel, & McGuire, 1987).
They concluded that the emotional impact of tele-working is concentrated around three main themes.
A smartphone is a wireless device with functions to manage your calendar, make phone calls, browse the Internet and to receive and answer e-mails anytime, anywhere.
In other words, the increased autonomy comes at cost of the shifting expectations of availability escalating the commitment to stay connected.
Other advances associated with smartphone use are improved responsiveness, real time information, faster decision making and more flexibility in work schedules. It seems difficult, if not impossible, for mobile users to maintain a satisfactory balance between work and personal life. Sonnentag (2003) showed that individuals benefit from shorter rest periods that occur during the evenings of normal work weeks.
As a consequence people often find themselves unable to cope with an increasing amount of information (Chan, 2001). The results showed that e-mail was cited as the primary cause of personal information overload.
However, this same continuous availability leads to an increase in work interruptions, and in turn to increased disorganization (Renneker & Godwin, 2005). Workers in general, and communicators in particular, operate in dialogue with colleagues and customers. The desire to retreat from stressful environments goes hand in hand with the desire to stay involved.
In other words we interpreted the results of the studies used to show which aspects of e-mail communication can be considered as demands and resources, and hence complicate or facilitate our working life. Mobile devices, such as the smartphone, increase our flexibility and help to improve our responsiveness at times we are not physically present at the office. Furthermore, we tried to explore the possible setbacks of (mobile) e-mail use with increasing demands and a depletion of energy as a result. However, the results of our theoretical overview are mixed and even paradoxical on some occasions.
Surprisingly, difficulties in managing the work-home balance are a frequently cited drawback of the smartphone (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005). Additionally, it is interesting to explore the reasons why intensive smartphone users have the urge to stay connected during evening hours. Many e-mail users report information overload, especially when the received information was not requested. If we keep in mind that both a computer and a smartphone have a switch-off button and that we are in control of the device and not the other way around, we can exploit the benefits of these new media, use them as resources, and be aware of their pitfalls. The central aim of this paper is to give an overview of research on the impact of e-mail provided by personal computers and smart mobile devices on work using the JD-R model as a framework.
Therefore, in the present paper we focus predominantly on the impact of e-mail, provided by personal computers as well as smart mobile devices, on organizational life. Moreover, particular the impact of mobile devices on work is a relatively new research field, and the empirical studies handling this issue are relatively few. Job resources reduce the impact of job demands and the associated costs, are functional in achieving work goals, and they stimulate growth, learning and development.
How much of the autonomy is left when the workday is dominated by e-mail alerts on the desktop? Over the years, research has examined how the social meaning of an interaction is affected by the absence of visual cues, especially in situations where interaction partners replace F2F with CMC (Walther & Parks, 2002), which frequently happens in organizational life today. Walther (1992) assumes that interactants are just as motivated to reduce uncertainty, form impressions and develop affinity in online settings as they are in face-to-face settings. Writing down emotional messages changes the intensity of the emotion because there is time to read over the text and reflect one’s emotional state (Fisher, in press). The misunderstanding is usually that the sender thinks (s)he has sent a clear message, and the receiver does not interpret the message in the way the sender intended it. In other words, in estimating how the receiver will interpret our message, we take our self as the main reference point. Especially in customer service which increasingly takes place online, it can be a reason for losing customers without knowing why. In organizations, feedback is considered as a first step to improvement and personal development. When feedback is blunt and negative it can damage the relationship between the manager and the employee. There is evidence that e-mail encourages people to communicate more (Balter, 1998) and is critical for success in business (Vile & Collins, 2004).
Especially in comparison with regular mail, e-mail messages tend to be shallower and more reactive (Bertacco & Deponte, 2005). In view of the fact that e-mail facilitates workers to be separated in time and place, the likelihood that colleagues spend time together at one place is decreasing. Affective bonds and emotional involvement which can be essential in teamwork are harder to attain when all communication takes place online. First, the effects of being away from the office environment and being physically separated from colleagues.
This flexibility gives individual workers the opportunity to realize a better work-life balance (Rood, 2005; Taylor, 2003). The company’s increasing expectations regarding availability suggest that employees feel compelled to immediately respond to work-related messages even during leisure time (Davis, 2002).
Information overload originates both from own requests for information and information received inertly (Marcusohn, 1995).
However, although there was a small overall increase in number of e-mails, the officers did not feel that the mobile technology contributed to information overload.
An e-mail interrupt is any e-mail distraction that makes an employee to stop the planned activity. Strategies for technology use might be moderated by a worker’s relationship with coworkers and the culture within which the interaction takes place (Renneker & Godwin, 2005). Since the impact of mobile devices on both performance and employee well-being is still a niche in the research field, and decent empirical research is needed, we hope that this overview paper will generate ideas and encourages researchers to set up studies handling these issues. When the server at work is down for a day, we realize how dependent we have become on the computer and how handicapped we are in our work without access to the Internet. We focused primarily on e-mail communication since that is still the most common form of CMC in business settings, but next to e-mail we extended our search to the effects of mobile e-mail facilitated by smartphones on organizational life. What starts as a useful job resource can become a risk factor and end up as an increasing job demand because of mismanagement, changing expectations and feelings of losing control.
Potential predictors for staying connected during evening hours are ambition, self control, how central work is in your life and work engagement. Again, the sense of personal control is an important factor in the experience of quick access to information as a source of stress or as a facilitator in work. The Linked In (a business-oriented social networking site) profile needs an update, one has to respond to messages on the discussion board, scan the company network for news messages, etc. There is a still increasing number of studies on the social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication, but to date the impact of mobile e-mail on organizational life has been neglected. Therefore we had to extend our scope to studies focusing on the impact of e-mail communication in general and the implications of mobile working for both well being and performance. It should be noted that answering e-mail usually is something that is assumed and not part of one's job description. This may have consequences for the decoding of others’ emotions because we cannot make use of nonverbal cues in the interpretation of incoming messages. Additionally, you are in conscious control over which emotions you deliberately choose to display in your e-mail, since there is no risk of unconsciously leaking of nonverbal cues. We implicitly assume that because we know what we intend to communicate; the receiver will automatically know it as well. Therefore, besides the promising possibilities in reducing emotional labor in communicating online in customer service, the overestimation of how competent we are in communicating ambiguous e-mail messages can be a pitfall. This makes it an important resource fuelling our motivation at work (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). Sussman and Sproull (1999) experimentally tested the influence of media choice (F2F, telephone, synchronous CMC) on feedback (positive or negative).
Since individuals have difficulties in communicating negative evaluations face-to-face, e-mail might be beneficial for the sender.
The way in which employees manage time and attention in relation to answering e-mail is susceptible to mismanagement. This might bring about important social psychological consequences in that senders abbreviate their interactions and are more egocentric, in that they reduce perspective taking, than individuals who interact F2F (Wicklund & Vandekerckhove, 2000). Furthermore, communicating strictly online in a formal business setting might make it more difficult to express your own emotion which may be stressful (Mann, 1998). Tele-workers experience social isolation, a reduction in the affective bond with colleagues but also lack of technical and emotional support. These effects were also strongly influenced by the degree of free choice and autonomy in becoming a mobile worker. However the asynchronous nature of e-mail allows some flexibility in when to respond, and enables a sense of control over incoming messages (Mazmanian et al., 2006). Especially employees high on work-home interference were still putting effort in their jobs during the time that might be used to recover from load effects that were build up during regular work time (Van Hooff, Geurts, Kompier & Taris, 2006). Notebooks and Internet access at home started a process in which it has become technically possible to work at home in the evening hours. This information overload can lead to reduced productivity and can have negative effects on health and well being (White & Dorman, 2000). Rubinstein and colleagues (2001) have examined the time cost implications of task familiarity and complexity in task switching.
However, the shift towards online communication has not only brought good things in organizational life. Another, related concern is that because of the shift from F2F communication to CMC the occasions for casual communication decrease (Sarbaugh-Thompson & Feldman, 1998).
The increasing expectations regarding availability make employees feel that they immediately have to respond to work-related messages, even during leisure time (Davis, 2002). Next to self report measures it is also necessary to include other ratings in the research designs.
It is interesting to empirically test the influence of the experience of personal control on smartphone use.

Bakker is professor of Work and Organizational Psychology at Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The costs of e-mail seem to be disproportionally loaded on the recipient who has to deal with excessive amounts of e-mail and the pressure to answer these e-mails as soon as possible. Only few have the discipline to structure the day in such a way that they plan fixed times to deal with e-mail.
The key terms used were: CMC, JD-R model, mobile e-mail, ubiquitous computing, continual communication, tele-work, smartphone, Blackberry, always on culture, availability, non verbal cues, feedback, virtual, mobile technology, nomadic, online, work-home interaction.
A business setting is considered to be more formal than social interaction online, therefore it seems plausible that emoticons are not always appropriate to use.
In addition, the lack of nonverbal cues also has consequences for the expression of our own emotions since every emotion has to be verbalized and part of the nonverbal expression happens unconsciously. Miscommunication can be a source of stress because an employee has to take action to correct the message which automatically implies that extra time and attention is needed to handle the message again.
Kruger and colleagues set up five experiments to examine to what extent participants overestimated their ability to communicate over e-mail.
However, if information is likely to be negative, media choice can be crucial in delivering the feedback (Fulk & Mani, 1986).
Before the communication begins the sender anticipates how the reaction of the receiver might be; defensive, disbelief, or emotional distressed (Sussman & Sproull, 1999).
The results showed that individuals using CMC to deliver negative feedback distorted it to a lesser extent than individuals communicating F2F. Evaluating employees by e-mail might decrease the emotional demands of the messenger, but will it also benefit the receiver? Inherently in e-mail communication is the expectation that people can be reached easily and quickly, which is probably the reason why e-mail is rated as such an attractive medium (Manger, Wicklund, & Eikeland, 2003).
In the section handling egocentrism in e-mail we have seen what may be the consequences of egocentrism in terms of miscommunication and increased stress levels.
These reduced opportunities to give and receive support are also an issue for the increasing number of tele-workers. Second, related with the first point, the effects of having to rely on a computer as the primary mode for communication. However, the difference between notebooks and smartphones is the amount of perceived control an employee has over the initiative to start work.
Messages sent became less formal and less complex than using a standard personal computer or laptop (Allen & Shoard, 2005).
They showed that switching between tasks resulted in a delay before engaging in effectively in a new task, even if the worker had been previously engaged in the task.
We have argued that the same act can function as a resource for the receiver and simultaneously function as a demand for the sender and vice versa. E-mail communication requires intent and planning which automatically reduces spontaneity and opportunities for social support. This results in ongoing monitoring and compulsive routines of chronic checking for new messages (Gergen, 2002).
Are intensive smartphone users aware of how much time they spend on work during evening hours?
A smartphone increases the flexibility of an employee but facilitates working long hours with a risk of disturbed work-home balance at the same time. Remarkably, the answering of e-mail is rarely part of our job description, but more an underlying assumption of the functioning in nowadays’ organizational life. Employees are increasingly becoming multi media experts and seem to know quite well which medium is appropriate for what message.
Since many organizations demand that their service employees apply to strict display rules according to what emotions they have to show to customers, CMC may have potential to make this work easier. The results showed that this is true at least for trying to communicate humor, sarcasm, some emotion or tone and regardless the amount of freedom they had in constructing their messages. The latter authors argue that deliverers of bad news or negative feedback have three options. In the CMC condition the senders of negative feedback were straighter in their communication and reported higher levels of comfort and satisfaction.
Another reason behind the success of e-mail might be that most recipients have the habit to answer messages the minute they arrive, which makes e-mail almost as quick as a phone call (Markus, 1994).
The increasing use of mobile technologies in organizational life facilitates employees to work in distributed places. They can help fuel interest in informal organizational processes (Ashforth & Humphrey, 1995). For example, the loss of richness of communicated material and the problems caused by technical breakdowns. Smartphone use can be very demanding since the employees experience closer monitoring and supervision, resulting in a lack of autonomy (an important resource according to the JD-R model).
Van Hooff and colleagues (2006) also showed that work-home interference and its extended demands was positively related to fatigue and sleep complaints, indicating that it indeed reflects a lack of recovery. A smartphone indicates new messages or an incoming phone call, but the receiver has no control over when this happens. Furthermore the officers indicated that using the devices outside their conventional work setting was beneficial in terms of the ability to spread their workload.
Each fragmentation to a task adds to the total time required to complete it (Rubinstein, Meyer, & Evans, 2001). One of the important outcomes of the JD-R model is that when both job demands and job resources are high, employees are motivated and engaged in their work (Demerouti et al., 2001). For example, feedback on performance is considered an important resource for the receiver because it is a first step to improvement and personal development (Bakker et al., 2003).
Tele-workers report social isolation, reduction in affective bonds with colleagues and lack of social support as major disadvantages of their status (Mann et al., 2000). Or do they underestimate their work-home interference since the smartphone intrudes gradually in their private life. His research has been published in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior, and Human Relations.
What is the impact of work intruding in our private life on both performance and general well being? But even in a work setting many messages contain both social and task-oriented components, and are ambiguous in a sense.
Service employees constantly have to regulate their emotional expressions while interacting with customers (Grandey & Brauburger, 2002). There are indications that egocentrism is an important source in miscommunication (Kruger, Epley, Parker, & Ng, 2005). First, the problem remains that the rather formal setting of business communication does not lend itself for the use of emoticons, which are interpreted as informal and in some cases as incorrect. However, although a speedy response can be beneficial for the efficient running of organizations, it can be a source of occupational stress for employees (Gillespie, Walsh, Winefields, Dua, & Stough, 2001).
Duxbury, Higgins and Lee (1994) argue that work-life stress is explained in terms of perceived control. It is likely that the smartphone with its always-on culture disturbs the important process of recovery and may even lead to a decrease in productivity and performance levels on the long run.
The smartphone as facilitator of the intrusion of work into personal lives was seen as an acceptable trade-off for personal productivity and flexibility benefits (Allen & Shoard, 2005). In the light of the JD-R model, task variety, as a resource, can also be linked to positive outcomes. Taking into consideration the research on delay and interruptions it might be interesting to examine when interruptions are interpreted as a welcome variety in work and when interruptions are interpreted negatively as an interference of the flow an employee is in. However, people have a natural reluctance in delivering negative feedback (Rosen & Tesser, 1970), which can make the same feedback an emotional demand for the sender.
Social support from colleagues is considered an important resource in the light of the JD-R model and it has potential in buffering the undesirable effects of high job demands (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). Especially the communication of ambiguous messages is a challenge in a strictly text-based environment. One of the functions of nonverbal cues in F2F communication is that the ambiguity of a message is reduced. Hochschild (1983) argued that this form of emotional labor is not without costs for the employees because this process requires much effort from the employee. Second, if we are not aware of our lack of competence in communicating ambiguous messages, we will not feel the need to use an emoticon to clarify either. Another option is to omit (some of) the negative feedback - an option that is not always desirable or possible in an organizational setting.
The benefits of e-mail, for example working together with individuals across multiple sites, are evident. In this section we will elaborate subsequently on teleworking, smartphones, changes in availability requests, the implications for work-home balance, information stress, interruptions and engagement in new technology.
Furthermore, they reported increased work pressure and the inability to separate and keep distance from work (Jarvenpaa & Lang, 2005). Research has linked interruptions to both negative and positive impacts on task performance (Jett & George, 2003; Perlow, 1999, 1997). A still increasing number of organizations decide to go mobile and to provide their employees with smartphones. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Verhandelingen, Afd. Opdahl (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 24) (Vol.
Therefore, in the subsequent section we will elaborate on the challenges in e-mail communication centred around the communication of ambiguous messages. In the light of the JD-R model, we argue that CMC may moderate the increasing emotional demands related to emotional labor in facilitating emotion regulation online. This implies that miscommunication, when it backfires to the employee, can increase the workload. However, the costs of e-mail are disproportionally loaded on the recipient who engages in continuous activity switching between e-mail and other tasks (Renaud, Ramsay, & Hair, 2006).
Interruptions seem to facilitate workers’ speed and accuracy, especially on monotonous well-learned tasks (Jett & George, 2003). If employers are aware of the disadvantages of working mobile for the employee, they can take action to minimize these effects. Where F2F communication is about what is said and how it is said, e-mail communication is limited to the former. Since miscommunication is related to failure, this can be demanding for the employee, both emotionally and mentally.
The latter researchers illustrated that the costs for the sender are negligible but the cost for the recipient of continuously monitoring to respond consistent with sender expectations is high. Additionally, not every message recipient experiences incoming messages as an interruption (Jett & George, 2003; Markus, 1996).
Therefore, this paper can function as an eye-opener since it lists the benefits as well ass the potential pitfalls for remote workers. Besides the lack of nonverbal cues that complicates the communication of messages with ambiguous content, in the subsequent paragraph the relation between egocentrism and miscommunication is discussed.
According to the JD-R model, these demands can lead to strain and in the long run to deteriorated well-being. Translating these findings to the JD-R model one might consider e-mail as a helpful resource for the sender but as a demand for the recipient. The JD-R model showed that demands only lead to an increase in strain when an employee is not capable to mobilize additional resources to compensate.
Feedback, an important resource according to the JD-R model, is discussed in the next section.

The secret by rhonda byrne pdf in hindi free download
How to change your username on snapchat

Comments to Computer mediated communication course syllabus


29.07.2014 at 20:46:31

Physique and health through a whole new strategy.


29.07.2014 at 18:19:25

Calls from a Overall health Coach regarding particular.


29.07.2014 at 19:38:16

I advise it to each and every individual who believes or want to think come, or what genre.


29.07.2014 at 14:33:31

Three months earlier, he had been accepted them for editing, and it supports.