Nuclear war what it would look like,disaster preparedness for churches near,disaster management pdf 2013 - Step 3

Think you might escape the aftereffects of a limited nuclear war that happens on the other side of the globe from you?
Imagine that the long-simmering conflict between India and Pakistan broke out into a war in which each side deployed 50 nuclear weapons against the other country’s megacities. Beyond the local human tragedy of such a situation, a new study looking at the atmospheric chemistry of regional nuclear war finds that the hot smoke from burning cities would tear holes in the ozone layer of the Earth.
Mills’ work, which appears online today in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, used a model from National Center for Atmospheric Research to look at the impact of throwing 5 million metric tons of black carbon, or soot, into the atmosphere. Along the way, the hot soot would cause a variety of atmospheric changes with a net result of huge reductions in ozone, which in the stratosphere serves as sunblock for the earth. The reduced levels of ozone would persist for five years, with substantial reductions in ozone continuing for another five years after that. The US initiated economic sanctions against Russia, has attacked its currency and has manipulated oil prices to devastate the Russian economy. The ultimate aim is to de-link Europe’s economy from Russia and weaken Russia’s energy dependent economy by denying it export markets.

Karachi, Bombay, and dozens of other South Asian cities catch fire like Hiroshima and Nagasaki did at the end of World War II. The increased UV radiation resulting from the ozone loss could more than double DNA damage, and increase cancer rates across North America and Eurasia. He found that when a cluster of cities are burning together, they end up creating their own weather, pumping soot 20,000 feet into the atmosphere. In the middle latitudes, the researchers found the ozone layer would be reduced by 25 to 45 percent, with the polar regions losing 50 to 70 percent of their ozone coverage. It was behind the coup in Ukraine and is now escalating tensions by placing troops in Europe and supporting a bunch of neo-fascists that it brought to power.
Washington poured five billion dollars into Ukraine with the aim of eventually instigating a coup on Russia’s doorstep.
After decades of Cold War research into the impacts that a full-blown war between the Soviet Union and the United States would have had on the globe, recent work has focused on regional nuclear wars, which are seen as more likely than all-out nuclear Armageddon.
Once there, sunlight would heat the smoke, and drive it up 260,000 feet above the earth’s surface.

So, add us to your ad blocker’s whitelist or pay $1 per week for an ad-free version of WIRED. Unfortunately, most of those living in NATO countries remain blissfully ignorant of this fact. Yet the bought and paid for corporate media in the West keeps the majority of the Western public in ignorance by depicting Russia as the aggressor.
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Conde Nast.
That the US is a ‘force for good’ and constitutes the ‘world’s policeman’ – not a calculating empire underpinned by militarism.??By the 1980s, Washington’s wars, death squads and covert operations were responsible for six million deaths in the ‘developing’ world.

The apocalypse and revelations xbox
Food and disaster management ministry bangladesh
Survival tactics list of
National geographic expeditions alaska inside passage

Comments to “Nuclear war what it would look like”

  1. eldeniz writes:
    This sort of a kit, it indicates you are almost can.
  2. LEYLISIZ_MECNUN writes:
    Recharging them in the field, so carry extra charged lawyer to return.