Plans for magnetic power generator,emergency preparedness kit supplies list 5th,electromagnetic spectrum lowest to highest,documentary films wikipedia nl - Reviews

A Practical Guide to Free-Energy Devices                                                                               Author: Patrick J. This is a fast-moving field of research and development, and one where a single person working alone, can outperform research establishments with unlimited budgets and many staff members.
I am assured by a Tesla expert that the supposed link with Nikola Tesla is completely spurious as it is not relevant. However, on a more realistic level, I am regularly asked to recommend a device for someone to build. We should not dismiss the various forms of renewable energy such as wave power, RAM pump, solar panels, wind power, biomass and the like. If you have the space and the sunshine, then a parabolic mirror can focus the sunshine, produce steam and drive a generator, a mechanical drive, a pump, or whatever else is needed. It is not necessary to "go for broke" and aim at a device which will completely do away with your power needs for evermore. The output is much more powerful than the input from the solar panel and can be used to run power tools, charge batteries or perform other useful tasks at effectively no cost at all. The Frenette heater (chapter 14) does give significant heat output for the modest power input needed to spin the central shaft. There are many high-performance alternatives which need special skills or equipment to build, but these can be found and constructed by those people who have above average skills and workshop facilities. Devices which can provide power at any time, and at any location, include running a standard electrical generator with water as the only fuel (chapter 10).
While it is perfectly possible to run this type of generator with water as what appears to be the only fuel, it must be realised that a generator of this type produces noise which will not be acceptable for neighbours if the user lives in a congested city environment.
The Adams motor (chapter 2) when accurately built, can produce eight times as much output power as the power needed to make it operate.
And if the electronics used to drive it is something which you have not come across before, then chapter 12 shows you how to understand and make these kinds of electronic circuits.
This motor operates by moving the magnets on the rocker arms, away from the rotor magnets when they would oppose the rotation and closer to the magnets on the next rotor which would promote the rotation.
The DC motor is pulsed by a simple electronic circuit and the flywheel spins permanent magnets past a circle of coils of wire. A similar wheel-pulsing method is used in the water-jet generator (chapter 4) which looks like a very simple thing to implement.
One of the most straightforward projects would be replicating Chas Campbell’s flywheel system.
Or if you prefer, an arrangement where there is more than one flywheel, again, keeping the flywheel shaft input drive pulley larger than the output pulley on that shaft.
This project needs patience as each of the tubes needs to be filed down so that they all resonate at the same frequency.
If you decide to start some project, then whatever project you pick, the most important thing is that it should be one which interests you. This eBook is just a sharing of the information which I have come across during some years of investigating devices which are loosely described as being “free-energy” devices – a description which some people dislike because if costs money to construct or purchase a device which can produce useful work, even if the device appears to be self-powered. However, I am regularly asked for my opinion on various devices and which one is best suited to some particular person, so, reluctantly, I will share some personal opinions on a selection of devices. Please bear in mind that there has been a very high level of opposition to any of this type of information becoming well-known and so, information on each device tends to be limited, and while half a dozen devices may well be offered for sale in 2013, at the present time few are commercially available, leaving you to build your own or get a friend to join with you in the construction, which is actually a very good idea as small groups of people can have a very wide range of skills. These three devices have no moving parts and their performance has to be determined by measurements of the input power and the output power. When properly constructed and operated, these devices can certainly show you that COP>1 is definitely possible. The most convincing thing is if the device supplies it’s own input power as well as supplying some additional item, even a single LED. The Figuera split transformer is exceptional in that it is completely free of the usual crippling Lenz-Law effects and it has the capability of outputs of several kilowatts.
This spectacular design is capable of kilowatts of continuous excess power through the use of just two batteries. This is also very easy to construct and being a modular system it has the advantage that it can easily be expanded to give substantial power outputs.
These devices can be very effective in what they do but they are not likely to convince anyone of COP>1 operation. The Bedini pulse-charger has an impressive spinning wheel or rotor, but it’s usefulness is severely limited as it can only charge batteries which are not being used to power a load.
Simple boosters such as the “Smack’s Booster” can be built quite easily and they can improve the burn quality of the standard fuel used in an internal combustion engine very considerably, reducing the unwanted emissions and raising the mpg figures by a typical amount of 20% to 40%. This motor design is very, very simple and the first version was built using wood and it proved to be very effective, having a two-inch (50 mm) diameter drive shaft. This is a very simple and direct method of getting permanent magnets to provide continuous drive with just a very low electrical input used to change the location of the stator magnets in much the same way as in Don Kelly’s motor design.
This arrangement of magnets and generators is expensive as each generator uses thirty-six powerful magnets to give good magnetic coupling between the drive motor and every generator. This is a device which has been replicated and it too demonstrates the “impossible” perpetual motion so feared by our revered “scientists”. This is a good design for people who do not want to get involved in electronics as it uses standard mechanical components and an off-the-shelf motor and generator. The usefulness of a pyramid depends to a considerable degree on how sunny the local environment is. This method for extracting substantial power was disclosed by Nikola Tesla and has been demonstrated in broad outline on video by Don Smith, although he did not demonstrate equipment being powered by the electrical energy generated. This is a variation of the Charles Flynn motor where an electromagnet coil is used to modify the magnetic field of a permanent magnet.
As these designs are easy to build - especially the toroidal ones - they could well be an interesting place to start. As far as power output is concerned, thiese could be major winners due to their simplicity and simple design combined with the fact that once built and tested, larger version can then be made using the experience gained by the small versions.
This design is powered by permanent magnets which are intermittently shielded by electromagnet windings.
As far as power output is concerned, this is a major winner as it is both self-powered and provides kilowatts of excess electrical power.

This is a design which generates cold electricity which can safely light a bulb under water. Ron Classen has replicated this design and reached COP=2.2 after very considerable expenditure of time and money.
Richard has shown his generator on the US version of The Dragon’s Den television programme and he has offered his generators for sale. These devices appear quite straightforward, but I have never heard of anyone actually attempting to replicate either of them. These three devices have to be categorised as being untested designs and some people are of the opinion that they can’t work. These three designs have very impressive performances, far outperforming Michael Faraday’s efficiency results (which “scientists” believe are the maximum possible). This is a simple physical device capable of improving the air flow around a moving vehicle to such an extent that it produces better mpg figures for the vehicle. This is a device which has major potential and yet one which nobody seems interested in attempting to replicate. This plug design is quite capable of giving improved fuel burn inside an internal combustion engine that the mpg performance can be increased very substantially and harmful emission drastically reduced.
This style of motor with magnetic shields being physically moved between pairs of magnets is probably one of the more difficult magnet motors to get operational. This design is simple and as it was built and demonstrated in 1939 before electronic components were readily available, it could be built without any electronics knowledge at all. This motor has been demonstrated in a Dutch technical college and taken apart after the initial running was completed, showing that it’s operation was wholly genuine.
This is a low power device intended to operate the lights on road traffic cones without the need for a battery.
These devices appeal to a high percentage of interested people and yet they seem to be some of the most difficult to replicate. This device looks impossible, and yet it is reported to have been laboratory tested at COP=1.47 which is quite remarkable. While I don’t know the name of the builder, this pendulum is reported to have been swinging continuously for more than two years now and while it does not appear to generate any useful power output, it is certainly an amusing project, especially should you want to show it to those people who say that ‘perpetual motion’ is impossible. This is one of the more difficult devices to get operational, in spite of the fact that it appeals to a large number of people. Hermann Plauson’s patent which is in the Appendix, is so detailed and authoritative that it gives every indication that he is highly experienced in the actual design, construction and installation of serious aerial installations.
This has a very high potential as it can put out substantial electrical power in spite of it’s simple construction. This looks like a really good design but it has the problem that it needs a transducer or klaxon running at 600 kHz and there does not appear to be any such transducer readily available on the market.
In theory, each of these is capable of running a car engine without the need for any form of combustible fuel. These engines are perfectly viable but few people have the knowledge, skills, tools, workspace, inclination and time to go building or modifying an engine.
According to John Searle, constructing just one of the many magnets needed for his generator requires more than a day of work and a million pounds in finance. This involves the construction of a rotary generator with metal bodywork and so metalworking skills are needed (or somebody else with those skills needs to help out or be paid to do the work). These designs call for construction with a range of different materials, and generally speaking, the materials used in any prototype are normally of major importance. Neglecting the version which uses radium as that is probably difficult to obtain at the present time, the spark gap version is said to produce very substantial amounts of electricity while only using very simple components. This design includes magnetic shields and finding a suitable material for them might be a considerable problem. This is a compact and very effective looking device but the very compact nature of it’s construction probably makes it somewhat tricky to replicate.
It appears that Howard has not been able to build replications of his original working prototype and while the theory is perfectly valid, that failure has to put a question mark against almost all permanent magnet motors of that type, especially since Mike Brady experienced exactly the same thing and Australian developers with a successful “Lutec” magnet motor found that they could not replicate it unless they used parts from their original prototype.
This design appears to be in exactly the same position as Howard Johnson’s Permanent Magnet Motor. Shown on video, producing more than 500 watts of mains output power for 1.2 milliwatts of input power, this is clearly a device of major importance. This incredibly successful and powerful device which produced 1.5 megawatts for two years took major equipment to get it started. The passive design of Hans Coler can certainly be made to operate if you can persuade it to begin oscillating. To be perfectly honest, I have never managed to understand the work of either Karl Schappeller or that of Viktor Schauberger. These designs have been around for a long time and to date I have never heard of anyone who has managed to build one and got it to work.
This system is not economical in the broad sense in that it takes more energy to produce or reform the aluminium than is given out when it is converted to oxide in the process which produces hydrogen for combustion. This is a device which most people find very difficult if not impossible to get to COP>1 operation. While there is a patent for this design, there is not enough information for there to be any reasonable degree of success if you were to try to replicate it. While this device is, without question, a most impressive device which was demonstrated in public on many occasions, Thomas was intimidated and so never released full constructional details of how his device worked. While this unit has been demonstrated on video, showing impressive operation, I understand that it overheats after 22 minutes of operation. The late Paul Baumann designed and built several self-powered generators which were demonstrated on many occasions. While the demonstration of this device looks quite like a hoax, Muammer’s credibility jumped massively with the production of his current permanent-magnet-only motor which has been demonstrated publicly. I was reading the D9.pdf file you put together on Bob Boyce's electrolyser and PWM3G circuit.
The Hydrogen Garage is run by a very honest and reliable electrolysis enthusiast with many years of practical experience behind him, and there is no reason why you should not buy from there if you want to. OK, so if I want to build one of those boosters and I have 14.8 volts in my car how am I going to power 18 plates 5" x 4".

However, if all your journeys are short and the cell will never get up to its full temperature due to the short time it operates, then you could go for just six cells and with three plates per cell and that would make 18 plates.
If you use separate plates, then you have the difficulty of making good-quality electrical connections between six pairs of plates, and that can be quite difficult to do. This has already been done on at least nine different generators and run 24 x 7 for two and a half years now. Do you know if the V-twin Vanguard and Honda generator you have mentioned, do not have the waste spark? The people who have done these conversions say that retarding the spark to 2 degrees after Top Dead Centre was sufficient. If you decide to do it and are successful (as I would expect), then I would be happy to produce a document for you which would go out under your name. Do you have any values for Peter Lowrie's coils, the ones mentioned in the doc are "from a commercial installation with copper sheet wrapped around them" as it is my intention to use a Marine alternator.
Peter Lowrie used a marine alternator solely because he wanted three separate 2-volt supplies at 900 amps each. If you are determined to use a similar item, then you need to look at the spares options for professional, commercial equipment.
This is the first time I have heard that the Hydroxy is doing something BEFORE it is ignited.
Also, can you email me here or privately what you feel are the best Free Energy Devices these days. Gasoline molecules vary from chains of seven carbon atoms surrounded by sixteen hydrogen atoms, to chains of nine carbon surrounded by twenty hydrogen atoms.
With regards to free-energy devices, I get asked on a regular basis, what device is best for somebody to try building.
Obviously, if someone has converted a pick-up to electric operation and could put a water-fuel generator in the back, the kilowatts of excess electrical power would extend the battery range substantially and would recharge the batteries during a meal break or while away from the vehicle. To try and avoid saying the same things over and over again, I produced a document with my suggestions in it. Chas Campbell in Australia has a viable, commercial machine which also produces significant power without the need for any fuel. I have bought a 7-cell, series-connected electrolyser but the terminals are not marked for Plus and Minus connections. In Bob Boyce's electrical diagram, it shows three heavy-duty chokes: one from the rectifier bridge positive, one on the negative and one from the positive line to the circuit board. There is a document called "D9.pdf" which provides the details of Bob Boyce's resonant electrolyser design.
It is not possible to answer your question directly as we don't know what rate of gas flow you think would be needed or how long the pipe has to be. The amount of gas needed for your engine is reduced massively if you add cold water mist to the intake air. Unfortunately, there isn't any fixed answer to your question and you definitely can't use a rule of thumb to get a reliable answer.
I found in Tad Johnson’s experience this: “What I found frustrating is that the cell temperature would change and the system would stop making gas. First, I didn’t find in your book a Bedini pulser circuit so please give me direction where I can find it.
In your book there is a quotation which says: “I plan to market a pre-programmed chip capable of making any hydroxy system work. Tad Johnson used 1,200 volts and was able to get 3 lpm of hydroxy gas at just 1 milliamp of current (1.2 watts) but he found that he could not scale it up for greater gas output.
Chapter 10 has a circuit which finds and holds a cell on its resonant frequency and that circuit will be available ready-made from Courtierstown Marine in the near future. This subject has come up several times on the different forums and the experienced people recommend putting the hydroxy in on the low-pressure side of a turbo-charger. One or two people have tried putting it in on the high-pressure side and have found it ok, but it is distinctly possible that their hydroxy gas was low-grade and already laced with hot water vapour, lowering it's energy level and potential hazard, so my money is definitely on the low-pressure side. The self-ignition at 12 to 15 psi information comes from Bob Boyce who is easily the most experienced hydroxy user and investigator on all of the forums. That's why I was hoping to experiment with a medical diaphragm compressor (same as they use to store hydrogen). Bob Boyce, who is a very highly experienced hydroxy researcher, states categorically, that you should use the low-pressure side of the turbocharger. The objective is to extract a higher proportion of the energy contained in the normal hydrocarbon fuel, and not to add in energy produced by the combustion of hydroxy gas. This wonderful invention has recently changed hands, as John Christie and Lou Brits have since sold their intellectual property and rights of their free energy machine - for approximately $30,000,000 AUD!
Adapt it by filling in the timing key slot and cutting another which lets you set the spark timing to two degrees after TDC.
Feed the generator air, hydroxy and cold water mist from a Venturi tube, pond fogger or miniature carburettor. The generator can run well on that and produce kilowatts of excess electricity over and above the amount needed to power the electrolyser. Brute force DC which is usually less than Faraday although with great care, it can reach 212% Faraday. I thought the Hydroxy ignition was what was breaking down the gasoline into short molecules? In order to keep the system making gas you constantly have to keep the cell in resonance, and thus you really need the system to be controlled by a processor, that constantly checks frequency on both legs and then adjust inductance to keep the cell in resonance. One resonance is in an LC circuit where the "C" is the cell itself and the coil is the "L". This project is particularly suited to people who like maintaining, adjusting and tuning vehicles. With diesels, the process is slightly altered, as there is less time for bonding to occur, so improvement occurs much better at lower RPM than at higher RPM".

Best canned food emergency kit
Business continuity plan phases xcode
Free american gangster movie online 69
Digital electronics book pdf by rp jain

Comments to “Plans for magnetic power generator”

  1. 1989 writes:
    About obtaining a 3-season tent and bringing.
  2. LaDy_CooL_BoY writes:
    Notice that someplace we are nevertheless bounded radiation.