## Area code numbers for uk,cell phone caller id incorrect 87,how to track your spouses cell phone for free canada - Downloads 2016

21.01.2015
Yellow graphic overlay created by Earthfiles viewer Steve McMath based on Michael Reed interview and drawing below in this Earthfiles report. What Mike Reed calls radial jumps, some of us from long-time crop circle research call ratcheted spirals.

Now, it’s seventeen years later back at Barbury Castle and here comes this new pattern in fresh young barley that provoked Mike Reed to make a graphic to show how Pi to ten decimal places was precisely indicated in the crop. In looking at the pattern, the thing that struck me was the little dot right near the beginning of the pattern right outside the central circle.

I noticed that the first segment was longer that the second segment which was much shorter than the third segment. Then I noticed right where the next segment was, was a short segment again, which might be equivalent to 1. So, I took the photograph initially and started drawing lines through all the jumps in radii. Then I went back and started doing straight lines through the other jumps and I started trying to figure out the lengths of the other arcs before the jump – kind of proportional to the values that you would see in the digits of Pi.

While the value of pi has been computed to more than a trillion digits, elementary applications, such as calculating the circumference of a circle, will rarely require more than a dozen decimal places.

Then I went back and took the diagram from Andreas Mueller (CropcircleScience.org) and I drew lines through all of the jumps, all the way out past the end of the crop pattern.

What happened was that when I divided the formation up into ten of the jump sections, you get four lines cutting through the circle. It’s clear as a bell that the crop pattern traces out basically as the first 10 digits of Pi, including the decimal point. But certainly the ratchet design as a way of communicating – for example, you could have taken the circle and divided it up into 50 segments. This crop pattern happens to be very simple and very obvious in what the circle makers have done.

DID YOU COMPARE THE 2008 BARBURY CASTLE TO THE 1991 BARBURY CASTLE THAT ALSO HAS A RATCHET DESIGN AS ONE OF ITS APPENDAGES OFF THE TRIANGLE? The three circles in 2008 Barbury is a very simple relationship, but the whole pattern seems to have been done to be very clear about a simple communication mode in getting the point across that humans have a decimal arithmetic system and this clearly indicates whoever made the pattern understands that and those three circles might simply be a way of telling us they also understand the concept of multiplying simple numbers.

THE RATCHET DESIGN HAS COME UP IN THE CARAT DOCUMENT BY ISAAC, BASED ON HIS WORK AS A SCIENTIST AT THE PALO ALTO LABORATORY IN WHICH THE DOCUMENT TITLE IS ABOUT BACK-ENGINEERING EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY THAT RELATES TO INVISIBILITY AND PROJECTING 3-DIMENSIONAL HOLOGRMS, IS THERE ANYTHING IN THAT CONCEPT THAT ISAAC HAS DEFINED AS A TECHNOLOGY IN WHICH PATTERNS THEMSELVES IF DESIGNED PRECISELY CAN BECOME THEIR OWN SELF-FUNCTIONING SOFTWARE WITHOUT HARDWARE? Certainly CARET is using the same 90-degree segments as in the 1991 Barbury Castle formation. COULD CROP FORMATIONS AROUND THE WORLD FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS BE SOME SORT OF SELF-ACTIVATING SOFTWARE?

The concept of self-activating software compared to what we’re used to is a totally advanced concept. WHAT INTELLIGENCE WOULD BE TRYING TO IMPLANT SELF-ACTIVATING SOFTWARE IN THE CEREAL CROPS OF THIS PLANET AND TO WHAT END?

The whole concept of self-activating software in a graphic form is certainly an unusual concept.

BUT YOU ARE PROVOKED BY THE DISCOVERY IN A 2008 BARLEY FORMATION AT BARBURY CASTLE THAT YOU HAVE FOUND A GRAPHIC WAY OF DEPICTING PI?

WOULD IT BE FAIR TO SAY THAT SOME INTELLIGENCE MIGHT BE TRYING TO GIVE US A ROSETTA STONE FOR A MATHEMATICAL LANGUAGE THAT HAS BEEN ENCODED IN CROP FORMATIONS OVER THE PAST QUARTER CENTURY?

THE RATCHET DESIGN WHICH CAME UP IN BARBURY 1991 AND BARBURY 2008 AND IN THE CARET DOCUMENT, THEY ARE ALL THE SAME RATCHET DESIGN.

Yes, the CARET document is identical to the 1991, other than the fact that the radial arcs in Barbury 1991 are not thicker and thinner as in the CARET document.

I think I just happen to be the guy thinking about the number ratios because I happen to use the value of Pi a lot in my electronic calculations.

Mike Reed once worked at the University of Arizona in Tucson on the Multi-Mirror Telescope (MMT) at Mt.

Reed was studying aerial photographs at Earthfiles of an extraordinary crop formation at Barbury Castle in Wiltshire, England, reported June 1st.

Take the smallest angle sector and call it one (1), then compare the other ten sectors contained angle to the smallest and pick the closest single digit for the ratio.

I interviewed Mike Reed not only about his astonishing discovery, but asked him about the ratcheted spirals drawn in the complex diagrams of the 2007 CARET document from the Palo Alto Laboratory that was sent last year as a possible explanation of the aerial dragonfly drone phenomenon. For example, a value truncated to 11 decimal places is accurate enough to calculate the circumference of the earth with a precision of a millimeter, and one truncated to 39 decimal places is sufficient to compute the circumference of any circle that fits in the observable universe to a precision comparable to the size of a hydrogen atom.

But if that were more tightly packed and had more equivalent segments in it, you could pack a lot of information into that.

The ratchets divided that circle into four segments and each segment is of equal arc length – not of equal radius. The fact that the Pi decimal point is included (in the 2008 Barbury Castle barley pattern) and there is rounding up to 10 decimal places is to me a little mind boggling! The difference in the CARET document has different thickness in the arcs, where there are jumps in radius. There is definitely more information in the varying arc thicknesses than just jumping radius segments.

The use of smaller sectors in angle to communicate a base 10 number set is what is really unique to the current Barbury Castle pattern.

So, I have it memorized and as you look at those sectors, it started to ring a bell and got me going on the analysis.

So, I clicked on the Lucy Pringle website and there were more detailed photographs and more from a vertical shot so you could really see the pattern. I happen to remember Pi to six digits, which is 3.14159 because I use that all the time in calculations. The ratchet jumps and Pi numbers looked like they began to match, so I sent you a message at Earthfiles to say I thought there was something here. It clearly shows the progression of digits, whichmake up the first ten (10) digits of the value of Pi. If you’re going to publish that long number version of Pi, normally you would round it up, taking into account what the next digit was. Very little information in that design, whereas the current 2008 Barbury Castle pattern is quite informative in that it has clearly coded the first 10 digits of Pi. I’ve looked at the CARET documents and the things are so complex, they are a little mind boggling! Isaac said in the mid-1980s, he worked at the Palo Alto Laboratory on complex diagrams related to back-engineering extraterrestrial technology.

If you draw a straight line through that first jump, it goes right through another jump further out and another jump on the opposite side. But certainly there is the similarity of using jumps in radius on an increasing diameter spiral to perhaps communicate information.

It’s very, very clear when you look at the drawing of the sectors that these are digits. Ratcheted spirals are in those diagrams – and in the 1991 and 2008 Barbury Castle crop formations.

The Mueller diagram shows that the 3 has been rounded up in the ratchet pattern to four, which I thought was very interesting. These are individual digits with very little error possibility, so the number that comes out are the first ten digits of Pi.

Now, it’s seventeen years later back at Barbury Castle and here comes this new pattern in fresh young barley that provoked Mike Reed to make a graphic to show how Pi to ten decimal places was precisely indicated in the crop. In looking at the pattern, the thing that struck me was the little dot right near the beginning of the pattern right outside the central circle.

I noticed that the first segment was longer that the second segment which was much shorter than the third segment. Then I noticed right where the next segment was, was a short segment again, which might be equivalent to 1. So, I took the photograph initially and started drawing lines through all the jumps in radii. Then I went back and started doing straight lines through the other jumps and I started trying to figure out the lengths of the other arcs before the jump – kind of proportional to the values that you would see in the digits of Pi.

While the value of pi has been computed to more than a trillion digits, elementary applications, such as calculating the circumference of a circle, will rarely require more than a dozen decimal places.

Then I went back and took the diagram from Andreas Mueller (CropcircleScience.org) and I drew lines through all of the jumps, all the way out past the end of the crop pattern.

What happened was that when I divided the formation up into ten of the jump sections, you get four lines cutting through the circle. It’s clear as a bell that the crop pattern traces out basically as the first 10 digits of Pi, including the decimal point. But certainly the ratchet design as a way of communicating – for example, you could have taken the circle and divided it up into 50 segments. This crop pattern happens to be very simple and very obvious in what the circle makers have done.

DID YOU COMPARE THE 2008 BARBURY CASTLE TO THE 1991 BARBURY CASTLE THAT ALSO HAS A RATCHET DESIGN AS ONE OF ITS APPENDAGES OFF THE TRIANGLE? The three circles in 2008 Barbury is a very simple relationship, but the whole pattern seems to have been done to be very clear about a simple communication mode in getting the point across that humans have a decimal arithmetic system and this clearly indicates whoever made the pattern understands that and those three circles might simply be a way of telling us they also understand the concept of multiplying simple numbers.

THE RATCHET DESIGN HAS COME UP IN THE CARAT DOCUMENT BY ISAAC, BASED ON HIS WORK AS A SCIENTIST AT THE PALO ALTO LABORATORY IN WHICH THE DOCUMENT TITLE IS ABOUT BACK-ENGINEERING EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY THAT RELATES TO INVISIBILITY AND PROJECTING 3-DIMENSIONAL HOLOGRMS, IS THERE ANYTHING IN THAT CONCEPT THAT ISAAC HAS DEFINED AS A TECHNOLOGY IN WHICH PATTERNS THEMSELVES IF DESIGNED PRECISELY CAN BECOME THEIR OWN SELF-FUNCTIONING SOFTWARE WITHOUT HARDWARE? Certainly CARET is using the same 90-degree segments as in the 1991 Barbury Castle formation. COULD CROP FORMATIONS AROUND THE WORLD FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS BE SOME SORT OF SELF-ACTIVATING SOFTWARE?

The concept of self-activating software compared to what we’re used to is a totally advanced concept. WHAT INTELLIGENCE WOULD BE TRYING TO IMPLANT SELF-ACTIVATING SOFTWARE IN THE CEREAL CROPS OF THIS PLANET AND TO WHAT END?

The whole concept of self-activating software in a graphic form is certainly an unusual concept.

BUT YOU ARE PROVOKED BY THE DISCOVERY IN A 2008 BARLEY FORMATION AT BARBURY CASTLE THAT YOU HAVE FOUND A GRAPHIC WAY OF DEPICTING PI?

WOULD IT BE FAIR TO SAY THAT SOME INTELLIGENCE MIGHT BE TRYING TO GIVE US A ROSETTA STONE FOR A MATHEMATICAL LANGUAGE THAT HAS BEEN ENCODED IN CROP FORMATIONS OVER THE PAST QUARTER CENTURY?

THE RATCHET DESIGN WHICH CAME UP IN BARBURY 1991 AND BARBURY 2008 AND IN THE CARET DOCUMENT, THEY ARE ALL THE SAME RATCHET DESIGN.

Yes, the CARET document is identical to the 1991, other than the fact that the radial arcs in Barbury 1991 are not thicker and thinner as in the CARET document.

I think I just happen to be the guy thinking about the number ratios because I happen to use the value of Pi a lot in my electronic calculations.

Mike Reed once worked at the University of Arizona in Tucson on the Multi-Mirror Telescope (MMT) at Mt.

Reed was studying aerial photographs at Earthfiles of an extraordinary crop formation at Barbury Castle in Wiltshire, England, reported June 1st.

Take the smallest angle sector and call it one (1), then compare the other ten sectors contained angle to the smallest and pick the closest single digit for the ratio.

I interviewed Mike Reed not only about his astonishing discovery, but asked him about the ratcheted spirals drawn in the complex diagrams of the 2007 CARET document from the Palo Alto Laboratory that was sent last year as a possible explanation of the aerial dragonfly drone phenomenon. For example, a value truncated to 11 decimal places is accurate enough to calculate the circumference of the earth with a precision of a millimeter, and one truncated to 39 decimal places is sufficient to compute the circumference of any circle that fits in the observable universe to a precision comparable to the size of a hydrogen atom.

But if that were more tightly packed and had more equivalent segments in it, you could pack a lot of information into that.

The ratchets divided that circle into four segments and each segment is of equal arc length – not of equal radius. The fact that the Pi decimal point is included (in the 2008 Barbury Castle barley pattern) and there is rounding up to 10 decimal places is to me a little mind boggling! The difference in the CARET document has different thickness in the arcs, where there are jumps in radius. There is definitely more information in the varying arc thicknesses than just jumping radius segments.

The use of smaller sectors in angle to communicate a base 10 number set is what is really unique to the current Barbury Castle pattern.

So, I have it memorized and as you look at those sectors, it started to ring a bell and got me going on the analysis.

So, I clicked on the Lucy Pringle website and there were more detailed photographs and more from a vertical shot so you could really see the pattern. I happen to remember Pi to six digits, which is 3.14159 because I use that all the time in calculations. The ratchet jumps and Pi numbers looked like they began to match, so I sent you a message at Earthfiles to say I thought there was something here. It clearly shows the progression of digits, whichmake up the first ten (10) digits of the value of Pi. If you’re going to publish that long number version of Pi, normally you would round it up, taking into account what the next digit was. Very little information in that design, whereas the current 2008 Barbury Castle pattern is quite informative in that it has clearly coded the first 10 digits of Pi. I’ve looked at the CARET documents and the things are so complex, they are a little mind boggling! Isaac said in the mid-1980s, he worked at the Palo Alto Laboratory on complex diagrams related to back-engineering extraterrestrial technology.

If you draw a straight line through that first jump, it goes right through another jump further out and another jump on the opposite side. But certainly there is the similarity of using jumps in radius on an increasing diameter spiral to perhaps communicate information.

It’s very, very clear when you look at the drawing of the sectors that these are digits. Ratcheted spirals are in those diagrams – and in the 1991 and 2008 Barbury Castle crop formations.

The Mueller diagram shows that the 3 has been rounded up in the ratchet pattern to four, which I thought was very interesting. These are individual digits with very little error possibility, so the number that comes out are the first ten digits of Pi.

Compare best cell phone plans 2015 How to locate a person thru cell phone jammer Cheap cell phone service iphone Check phone number location indonesia |

21.01.2015 at 15:55:55 Answers to this query (who owns this telephone quantity?), you hearing, which will be held within.

21.01.2015 at 15:54:17 Unique kind have not been around.

21.01.2015 at 10:55:56 New to numerous investigators reason all of this has come about, simply assign you Per-Contact Blocking unless.

21.01.2015 at 23:15:40 Invasion of privacy and is illegal can help you determine whether or not or not telephone Lookup.