Cost to legally change name,law of attraction the secret book zola,how can i change my ip address to another state,finding my soulmate before i retire in - PDF Books

06.05.2015
All information contained herein is taken from materials filed in the case of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v.
ALL OF THESE PARTIES ABOVE were aware of or should have been aware of the blatant illegal activities of defense counsels Stephan Barber and Shawn O’Halloran in this and the underlying case and that all their key evidence and testimony was the product of extrinsic fraud, planting fraudulent evidence, spoliation of evidence, and suborned perjurious testimony in support of their defense litigation strategy.
Michael Ballachey as well as those of  Oakland City Attorneys John Russo(a former candidate for State Assembly District 16), Jannie Wong and Anita Hong were scheduled to begin on August 1, 2006 in Oakland California in response to charges of Corruption, Misconduct, Collusion, Cronyism, Illegal Ex-Parte Communications, Fraud Upon The Court, Spoliation of Evidence and Unclean Hands.
The complaint addresses the concern that a Superior Court Judges’ conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the bench upon which the judge rules is “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone’s civil rights is a federal crime. This onerous, odious taint and obvious complicity in quilt of these crimes makes it legally impossible for Brown to unbaisedly and practically investigate and prosecute the wrong doing of ALL the parties known to have committed these heinous, over 12 years of crimes against al-Hakim, his family, business, clients, community, and humanity as he himself defended the criminals and covered up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!
This is one of the myriad of reasons this matter will be referred back to Congressman John Conyers and the Judiciary Committee and United States Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice for complete investigation and prosecution of the crimes against al-Hakim. The City Attorney’s Office has engaged in acts to coverup these unlawful tactics, failed and refused to disclose to the court, nor inform the Judge of their improper and illegal transgressions regarding the fact of the defendants removing and taking custody of the City of Oakland files for several months and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their liability and the legal impact of their spoliation of evidence of the documents therein and their unpardonable breach in the chain of custody of the City of Oakland files. Presented next is the video of Ron “Con Crook” Cook boasting of having possession of the City litigation files, with the photos and Michael Michel warning the appraisal panel that the files had been illegally removed and was missing from the City and it was impermissible for them to consider the altered evidence. You now have the municipality of the City of Oakland with John Russo and the City Attorney’s Office being a willing accomplice to the unclean hands of the hostile intervener with their breaking the chain of custody of the court files and providing them to the defendants whom absconded with the files, engaged in spoliating them and later allowed the court to subpoena those files into the trial record without notifying the court of this specious, treacherous act.
It is further proof that the entire City case file was purged and re-constructed to accommodate the defendants litigation strategy in both this and the underlying Rescue Rooter case. The parties have failed and refused to honor those requests, the third such request and have now been subpeoned for the trial beginning February 15, 2008. If one does not speak up, then the transgressions goes unreported and the perpetrator goes on to harm again unchecked, it does not matter whom the transgressor is” said al-Hakim.
During the trial, testimony revealed that there were numerous documents and photos of a very damaging nature to the defense and AAA that were missing, altered, or incomplete. The City Attorney has failed and refused to effectively respond and such a non response, to ignore the fact that they have been caught in this transgression, reveals that John Russo and the City Attorney’s office was an accomplice to the breaking of the chain of custody of the evidence that was spoliated by the unclean hands of the hostile intervener, allowed the court to make the file a part of the record, and presented the spoliated evidence at trial. This deprivation of al-Hakim’s civil, human and due process rights by the law enforcement body of the City Attorneys’ office of Oakland rise to the level of criminal activity and “misconduct by local and federal law enforcement officials. The witness testimony and evidence that was procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious testimony by them and the defendants, they engaged in actions to interfere with their client and litigant’s legal case, engaged in actions to coverup the unlawful act of suborn and solicited perjurious testimony, committed fraud upon the court of the State of California, aided and abetted criminal activity, committed willful, criminal and corrupt perjury, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy, subornation of perjurious testimony and solicitation of perjurious testimony, fraudulent concealment, spoliation of evidence with the City of Oakland, their unpardonable breach in the chain of custody of the court files, has committed patterned willful, criminal, and corrupt deception and fraud upon the court, extrinsic fraud, spoliation of evidence with the disappearance of court records, and qualify for the doctrine of unclean hands. We have only a dim comprehension of the conflict He passed through and the kind of agonizing death He experienced.
These sublime words describe the condescension of Jesus from the throne to the manger and then to the cross. At the end of one of my crusades I visited a businessman who had attended every night but who had made no commitment. Only then will we be able to understand why God the Father turned away from His Son on the cross. He did not sense the real suffering of the cross and, therefore, had no true understanding of the cost of salvation. They could inherit only what their father had to give, so they were born with a sinful, fallen nature. This second probation was conditioned upon acceptance of a Saviour who would bear man's penalty through His own substitutionary death. How could God uphold His integrity by carrying out the penalty of the first failure, and still hold out the offer of a new life to everyone through another probation? In this case, however, there will be no further probation extended, and their death will be the second death-final, eternal extinction. The plan of salvation involves a resurrection of all men from the first death, so that they can be placed beyond the effects of Adam's sin. Just as the entire human race was represented by Adam in the Garden of Eden, so every man would be represented by Jesus, the second Adam.
Now we are told by Paul that the experience of the second Adam will directly affect all men. All the descendants of Adam lay under the influence of his weakness and failure, making it impossible for any of them to obey the law. The second Adam passed on the results of His sinless experience through spiritual birth-partaking of the divine nature, victory, and eternal life. Christ did not change the first death penalty for Adam's failure under the first probation, but He did abolish the second death for all those who received Him under the second probation. Was it easy for the Father to withdraw from His beloved Son and treat Him as though He was guilty of the most atrocious blasphemy and crime? Because he had initially failed to believe that God could give him a son from Sarah's dead womb, Abraham was subjected to another test concerning life from the dead. It would have been terrible enough to take his son's life, but with one stroke of the knife he was about to destroy the only hope of salvation for himself and every person who would be born. He experienced all the pain, heartbreak, and horror that attends the death of an only child. How does the death of one man, the second Adam, provide forgiveness for all who have sinned? Whoever forgives another person must actually substitute himself for the one he forgives, and be willing to suffer the consequences of the wrong done. He would, in effect, be consenting to his own death in order that the killer would not be punished. From the Garden of Gethsemane Jesus bore the accumulated sins of mankind on His breaking heart. The divine forbearance of God in allowing wicked men to torture His Son to death is the ultimate proof that He loves us with the same love that He loved Jesus.
God looked upon those wicked men as they spat upon Jesus and hit Him in the face with their fists. Even though He saw all our miserable failures He still wanted us to be with Him for eternity.
We are assured that some joyful motive girded Him for the shame and humiliation of the crucifixion. You can be that soul who will bear an everlasting witness to the love and grace of our Saviour.
The complaint, perhaps even more importantly, not only requested Merrily Friedlander, Chief of the Civil Rights Division, to make an investigation of a judicial hate crime, but also the many other civil rights and due process violations of judicial misconduct, and attorney extrinsic fraud upon the court and law that are themselves directly the matters complained.
During the trial, testimony revealed that there were numerous documents and photos of a very damning nature to the defense and AAA as the hostile intervener, that were missing, altered, or incomplete. These actions are currently under investigation with Russo and his staff being subpoenaed to testify at trial. Aren't you thankful for that red spot of Calvary that rescued this world from the control of our great enemy?
There it was that he met his Waterloo and suffered a decisive defeat from which he will never fully recover. Could our eyes be opened to grasp the true significance of His sacrifice, there would be no more miserable collaborating with Satan. We get glimpses that boggle our minds, but still, we are only scratching the surface of a subject which will continue unfolding for all eternity. We had developed a warm friendship during the four-week series, so I felt bold to ask him why he had made no decision for Christ. It is simply not true that He died just like all the thousands of others who were crucified on crosses around the wall of Jerusalem.


Please note that they did not inherit the guilt of their father, but only his weakened, sin-loving nature. A new hope was set before Adam and all his posterity through this second arrangement, but it did not alter the consequences of failing the first probation.
This is necessary so that they can be judged on the basis of their personal actions and choices. Jesus, the Creator, was incorporated into humanity, and stood before God as though He were every man. Had He possessed any supernatural advantage over His brethren in conquering sin Jesus would have given support to Satan's charge of injustice. All the effects of the first Adam's failure are completely counteracted by the second Adam. Just as the transformation of nature is dramatically real, so the privileges of the new family are also real.
This was made possible only because He submitted to suffer the horrible penalty of the second death in place of man. Only one man in the world has come near to understanding the intense suffering of the Father and the Son in that situation.
No one except Jesus would ever hold the destiny of a world in his hand as Abraham did in that moment. For example, if I forgive someone a debt, I must be prepared to suffer the loss of the amount. By accepting the results of the offense against him, he allows his own death to satisfy the penalty which could be legally laid upon the murderer.
Thousands of criminals were crucified in the same physical way that Christ was nailed to the cross, but they suffered only the bodily pain of the first death. Not one ray of light was permitted to penetrate the blanket of total alienation from His Father in heaven.
He knew the great majority would not accept the offer of eternal life with Him, even though it would be provided at such a fearful cost.
The quality of that love which brought Jesus to His death on the cross was such that He would have made the same sacrifice for even one soul. He saw in every soul the glorious potential of reflecting His own holy character for both time and eternity. Consider the amazing fact that one redeemed soul will outlive all the combined years of earth's total population.
It is postulated that if one human being would only submit to become one of the dogs, the entire pack could be saved from imminent death. His vague answer indicated to me that he had no understanding of the seriousness of accepting the gift of salvation. Jesus had to be treated as though He were guilty of every terrible sin which has ever been committed. There is no such thing as original sin, in the sense that Adam's descendants were accountable for his sin. He would let men live their limited life span and then die, regardless of whether they did good or evil. Adam died because he ate the fruit of the forbidden tree, not because of anything he did after that. But the victory of the second Adam opened a door of escape for the family of the first Adam. Please don't miss the point that one can join the new family only through a spiritual birth. One of the hardest things for the newborn Christian to accept is the total change of position, authority, and ownership under the new family arrangement. But under the new birth, man begins to lose his Adamic features and to look like the One who created him-Jesus. That man, Abraham, gave up his only son also, and became the first human to share the agony of the cross.
The account of that lonely journey to Mount Moriah is one of the most moving stories in the sacred Word.
The promise had been confirmed repeatedly that Isaac was the seed through whom the Messiah would come. No resurrection from the dead had ever occurred, but Abraham believed that God would fulfill His promise concerning Isaac's seed. God intervened only after it was fully apparent that Abraham would not hesitate to offer up Isaac. If I forgive a blow, I must be willing to suffer the pain of it, without requiring the one who gave it to be punished.
The forgiver accepts the consequence himself in order that the guilty one can go free without punishment.
He experienced the awful condemnation and separation from God that the vilest of sinners will feel in the lake of fire. In order to take the place of guilty sinners and to provide forgiveness there could be no difference in their penalty and His penalty.
But He also knew that a few would love Him and gladly receive the substitutionary death of His Son in their behalf. We see it also in the dangerous voyage He made across the sea to deliver the Gadarene demoniac. Eventually, in eternity, the life of that one person will outstrip by a million times all the life spans of all the inhabitants of this world put together. By a single step of faith we may exchange the deadly birthrights of the first Adam for the unsearchable riches of the second Adam.
Office, the case was thought of as being so egregious that even the infamous Bradley Schlozman, whom is now fired and facing Federal indictment with resigned Alberto Gonzalez for removing Democratic attorneys from the U. Could anyone be found who would voluntarily lay aside his human condition, and suffer the unspeakable indignity of turning into a dog? He had never made any kind of response to the gospel and, under my gentle questioning, confessed that he had no assurance of being saved.
Under the weight of that condemnation and guilt, He sweat great drops of blood and fell fainting to the ground in the Garden.
It is true that they also were subject to death just like Adam, but their death was not the punishment for Adam's sin.
But if, after the judgment, Adam is found worthy of the second death, it will not be because he ate the fruit, but because of other sins committed after that experience which were not confessed and forgiven. Justice requires that each individual be held accountable only for meeting the conditions of his own salvation.
Christ came to disprove the devil's false accusation by meeting the requirements of God in the same human nature that any man may obtain through faith in the Father. Through faith in Christ a new creation takes place, lifting man out of the hopeless, carnal state of the family of Adam. On the cross, with no ray of hope from the Father, Jesus was enveloped in the darkness of a billion lost souls. Now he was asked to take the life of that child of his old age through whom the world would be blessed and redeemed.
Thank God for the faith of Abraham and for the equal faith and submission of his beloved son.


Thus there is clearly a substitution of the innocent for the guilty in every act of forgiveness. His sensitive nature was traumatized by sharing vicariously the guilt of foul rapes, murders, and atrocities. He could save His Son from cruel taunts and blows, but if He intervened not one human being would ever live again.
So God turned away from His Son, and allowed Him to be crushed to death under the weight of sins He did not commit.
The genius of the entire plan of salvation revolved around the application of His death to individuals.
He did it in the strength of the anticipated joy of opening wide the gates of Paradise to welcome us into His never-ending kingdom. In this sense, one saved person represents more life, more accomplishment, and greater fulfillment than all the lost people combined.
In a moment of surrender and acceptance we begin to share the life He deserved, because He was willing to bear the guilt, condemnation, and death we deserved.
Watts in asking “What does a supposed terrorist act in Russia have to do with the negligent contamination of a home in America?” posed the argument that there must be consideration of and a response to the many issues in the complaint. Lovelady and others unnamed in the DA’s office; as well as Commissioner Oleon’s abuse of discretion, willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias that resulted in error.
Dramatic as it may sound, that is a feeble illustration of the humiliation of the divine Son of God. Then, let all men be raised from that first death, into which they fell through no fault of their own, and let them stand before God to answer for their own personal sins, for which they are responsible.
Without a resurrection no such judgment could be made, and no just retribution could be given. Does God create only an illusion to make it seem that man is being restored to the divine image, or does He powerfully provide for the change to take place?
He became sin in order to allow the full wrath of the law to fall upon Him in exactly the same way it would fall upon the lost. Now that you see a little clearer what it cost, do you find yourself responding to the investment He made in your salvation? Only one man was directly contacted during that unpleasant excursion, but that man, later, turned the whole countryside toward the Saviour.
Those were the faces which came into His mind as He hung on the cross, strengthening Him to drain the cup of His suffering. It was love for us, and the desire to be with us for eternity which led Him to endure the unendurable.
Jesus must have recognized that truth every time He looked into the face of a man, woman, or child. Retired judges Lee, Ballachey, and Hodge, though they live in three different counties, all coincidently hired the same Oakland defense firm.
Attorneys Generals offices nationwide, sent al-Hakim a letter referring the matter (because of jurisdictional limitations) to the California State Attorney General, California State Bar Association, the California State Judicial Council, and California State Insurance Commissioner for investigation and prosecution.
Hong and was told the file was back and available for viewing, and when asked who returned the file, she responded “it was returned by Steve Barber of Ropers Majeski”. We cannot grasp the glory and position from which He separated when He emptied Himself and came into the condemned, dying family of Adam. Others were enduring the same torture of the flesh, but none died from the same causes which took the life of the Son of God.
You and I were there, represented by the genes and chromosomes which later produced the hereditary pattern of Adam's children. Adam's happy future was conditional upon staying away from the forbidden tree, but he did not meet the condition.
Their death resulted from the degenerated constitution which Adam transmitted to his offspring.
And if God had done nothing more, that's the way it would have ended-for Adam and all of his descendants. Then their destiny would be determined on the basis of the second probation (between birth and the first death), and how they met the conditions of salvation through Christ. There is a theological debate as to whether God's righteousness is only accounted to man or whether it is truly imparted as well. It brings the love and sacrifice of the atonement within the understanding of every child of Adam. It was necessary for Jesus to suffer the second death in order to acquire the power to forgive.
Only two courses are possible: either justice will exact the prescribed penalty, or there must be forgiveness from the offended one. Here is a positive assurance that He was thinking of you and me as He bore the wrenching cruelties of the cross. In even the most degraded human being He saw a life that could memorialize His love for longer than time had been computed.
There has been judiciary litigation support given by now Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham and Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch whom had disqualifications or complaints filed against them with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. As partakers of his body and mind, all his descendants had to be affected by what affected him.
Those who feel that man is only accounted righteous, do not believe that he can really overcome sin and live a holy life, even in Christ.
Now we can grasp a little better how the Father and His only begotten Son suffered at the cross. If forgiveness is extended, the forgiver will have to accept the consequences of the sin, and suffer it in place of the guilty. In His omniscience God must have remembered every individual face and name, even of those who had not yet been born. And as ages roll by, we will continue to get new, thrilling insights into the nature of His atoning love and sacrifice.
George of The California Supreme Court, Victoria Henley of The California Judicial Council, Ronald G.
He is our father, and there are laws of heredity which reproduce the genetic pattern from age to age. By faith we try to grasp hold of the reality: Jesus and I share and share alike in all the spiritual riches of the Father. Overholt of The California Judges Association, The Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Alameda County Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez that portrays corruption.
So in order to grant forgiveness to the sinner, Jesus must be willing to bear in His own body the same punishment that the broken law would demand of the sinner.
The great, loving God who made us, and who gave up His only Son to die for us, now wants us to have everything His Son has, and also everything that He has!



Different types of meditation list
The secret movie free mp4 download youtube
Behavior change process model


Comments to «Cost to legally change name»

  1. RIHANNA writes:
    Thrilling and significant journey and that you i've.
  2. OKUW writes:
    Georgetown University offered and the way they psychological Affiliation, all age teams (Milennials, Gen.
  3. VIRUS writes:
    Athlete burnout in junior elite athletes by way of the about the future, gently re-direct your practices for.
  4. 606 writes:
    Section is devoted towards takes it to the best stage of meditation two.