How to get your music onto itunes for free

Doc love dating tips for guys

Get a boyfriend game rese?a,what words to say to get your boyfriend back now,half girlfriend online reading full book holes - Downloads 2016

One tenet my circle holds is that the voice of those whose voices have been marginalized and ignored should be listened to.
I guess what I'm saying is, the fact that I am even asking questions like this further corrupts my faith in my peer group and my ability to take action. Critically, the “targets” for this deceit and reputation-destruction extend far beyond the customary roster of normal spycraft: hostile nations and their leaders, military agencies, and intelligence services. It's like we've forgotten the 60s and 70s (when government agencies regularly used spycraft and reputation-destruction to bring down domestic organizations they saw as a threat). Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government. Maybe I'm drunk on bitcoiny tears this morning but if you are actually surprised by this then you are too naive to be on the internet. The overheads would be trivial and the potential candidates have already self-selected themselves by working for your organisation. I saw a term on the bingo board jquinby linked to that mentioned the Haversack Ruse - which is pretty hilarious and very internet worthy.
As someone said just a bit upthread this is apparently of a piece with anti-activist operations in the 60s and 70s.
It seemed almost as if someone had a software tool for spreading this stuff to comment sections instantly.
Outside of warfare, it has never been about response to an existential threat but always political. Instead of adding 'cyber' to your custom dictionary, better to search-and-replace cyber with 'computery'. That doesn't mean the Haversack ruse wasn't effective - it's just that because of all the double and triple and quadruple guessing and deeply multi-layered psyops on both sides in an intelligence struggle, it's very difficult to know for sure whether an enemy response is their real reaction or not even when your elaborate deception seems to have been highly successful. According to this month's Wired, we are going to start seeing more private clouds as people stop using public services, creating two kinds of Internets, a public space and private. More recently, I strongly suspect that a lot of the newer conspiracy ideas that are spreading are being spread deliberately.
But this comes up constantly in the conspiracy theory world, seemingly always brought up by new individuals. IF someone were wanting to discredit the whole area, it'd be hard to find a theory that was simultaneously more stupid and more offensive than that one.
If you had a hundred paid shills and wanted to influence public opinion, would you assign one of them to Metafilter - particularly considering that each shill must be covering multiple sites? That's right kids, some people are paid to troll Metafilter and they don't have to hide it from their boss.


On the bright side, to the very limited extent that there is a bright side, this slide suggests that these are not competent people. Just because there's a pointy-haired boss making bogus charts does not mean that said boss's underlings aren't competent manipulators.
I mean, I personally might, so that I could have an excuse to read it during the workday like I already do. The idea that the security services do not have operatives on most of the major sites strikes me as the crazy thing.
The membership of this place in the beginning was a veritable who's who of the hatethisphrase Web 2.0 and blogging movements. With 100 people, each covering multiple roles, you would assign zero of those roles to Metafilter? Reddit would certainly be more important - but consider the disposability of Reddit's threads.
The lack of a voting system also makes it easier to make an impact here by simply being forceful and writing a lot.
Too bad we don't have a part of the site for talking about the site itself, often used for discussing policy and etiquette questions with the mods and other users, making feature requests, or asking questions about the site itself. Am I the only one who is extremely curious about why the word "Magic" appears on multiple slides? That said, I am interested to see specifics of what they mean by pushing stories on facebook and twitter.
When living in the Outer Hebrides for five years, I spent much of my spare time chatting to the locals. I assume it is because performance magic is a profession that has long been deeply interested in techniques of deception and misdirection. It shows up close to Anthropology and Psychology in that one slide, so I would guess they're talking more about gaming belief systems than slight of hand. I wondered last summer about the timing of the US government's decision to finally acknowledge the existence of Area 51, and its subsequent coverage -- not to say trumpeting -- in numerous mainstream news outlets.
I have the sense to retire from active fieldwork and have now subsumed myself into playing with my hobby tumblr for google ad revenue instead.
In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or, more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest activity for political ends. But a big part of what's frightening here is seeing evidence that resources, techniques, and rules of engagement intended for use at an international level in response to an existential threat (state vs.
Dick, the substance of which was: the world really is becoming more like a Phil Dick novel.


Because, hell yes, GCHQ admitting to actively editing and falsifying a person's social media information in addition to harassing their friends and colleagues comes as an actual surprise to me. Where do the GCHQ slides propose gaslighting people to the point of desperate insanity and suicide? People who make slides as unreadable as that do not actually know very much about human psychology.
Activist groups in Tacoma, Washington were infiltrated and spied upon by a member of the Fort Lewis Fort Protection Service.
If a fraction of these allegations are true, I don't know why it would be implausible to believe that the same type of behavior takes place online. I mean, total speculation on my part, but it seems so far like the NSA works first and foremost with huge systems and tons of data, after crunching which humans then take more specific next steps; hiring shills seems really, really inefficient by comparison. They needed to cover up the fact that they (meaning, the Bush administration and the intelligence community) royally fucked up.
I don't suppose it had anything to do with a deliberate effort to draw public attention away from the Snowden information and direct it instead to a much sillier kind of conspiracy theorizing. I used to conduct design research among users using ethnographic methods and many of these terms and the process feels familiar. I even had an encounter in Second Life with a voluptuous avatar who showed up to ask me about Building 7.
I love metafilter, but it's not exactly a big player when it comes to setting the tone for stories of the day. That said, as politically liberal as our userbase skews, no one uses Metafilter to plan nonviolent acts of civil disobedience. Look at the two 'Discredit' slides in the OP: both of those describe something much more intense and intimate (and frankly, something which is a bigger problem) than writing apologetics on popular websites.
So they spread conspiracy theories that are unlikely on their face to increase the signal to noise ratio. Right now, Africa is seen as a wide open market for GMO seeds and the rest of that nonsense. So killing off projects right before they manifest, in the last minute, is a good way to ensure that conflicting ideologies don't occur. And that this is apparently not a few special cases but business as usual, complete with the boring details of internal training and power point slides.




How to win back an ex that has moved on fast
How to win her back after being needy


Comments

  • ELIK_WEB, 23.07.2015 at 19:33:56

    Who will pay attention how bad you little thing provide you with more of an advantage.
  • Super_Krutoy_iz_BK, 23.07.2015 at 20:12:20

    I asked if he was going to wait solely made me take into boyfriend again.
  • Ameno, 23.07.2015 at 22:58:32

    Contact her OR reply to her messages for those who hold.
  • Tonny_Brillianto, 23.07.2015 at 20:44:11

    That hopefully can pay dividends within the form of you.
  • lovely, 23.07.2015 at 10:57:32

    She questions me about previous may be the last thing in your thoughts - which is where and.