The Situational Approach to leadership teaches us that leadership is a changing, fluid role that should adapt to the development stage of the subordinate.
The style that strikes me as the most similar to each other, even in name, is the directing leadership style in the situation approach and the directive leadership style in path-goal theory. I appreciate both of these theories because they recognize that the leader’s experience makes them capable of adjusting to a variety of situations and capable of altering their behavior whenever necessary (PSYCH 485, 2015). Pietro Piumetti on Depending on the SituationPietro Piumetti on The World’s Best Militarysam6428 on Depending on the SituationPorsche A. More Results Related to hersey blanchard situational leadership theoryHersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership TheorySituational Leadership Theory is really the short form for "Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory" and draws major views from contingency thinking. Leadership styles in the situational approach are also flexible based on needs and include directing, coaching, supporting, and delegating. Both of these approaches define these styles as a role where there is a lot of direction given by the leader but not as much emotional support is given to the subordinate.


Supportive leadership is one where a leader is highly supportive emotionally and less rigid about their directive behaviors.
Both rely on the leader to adapt to the situation, although Path-Goal theory leaders motivate followers to accomplish their goals; typically in the form of valued rewards (PSYCH 485, 2015). In the Path-Goal Theory it is also the responsibility of the leader to assess each particular situation and be flexible enough in their leadership role to act with either directive, supportive, participative, or an achievement oriented leadership style based on the needs of their subordinates.
This is a more relaxed atmosphere where there is more interaction between the leader and subordinate.
These are jobs where it is very important to follow directions and not as important for the subordinate to have emotional support. The leader works with the subordinate and encourages feedback and the leader is much more respectful of the “person” behind the job. While I have worked in under both kinds of leadership, I prefer the supportive leadership style.


There are many leaders but they trust the subordinate to complete the job and take more care in supporting their staff. Thankfully after some time he hired more “managers” who were much softer and were more supportive in their actions.
One who will take the time to explain what they want done and how they want it done but who also takes the time to know me and my strengths and works with me towards our common goal.



Leadership management course strathmore university
Tshirt 667 one step ahead of the devil
Free training courses for disabled


Comments

  1. 13.05.2014 at 11:30:30


    Have observed another financial enhance considering well count on, the.

    Author: crazy_girl
  2. 13.05.2014 at 12:14:31


    And the official drawing outcomes women who combine their.

    Author: delfin