With Instructables you can share what you make with the world, and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts. This is a very simple Lego airplane that probably any if u could come up with, but i put it on here anyways. LOL, Well, I like to take apart my sets sometimes, not like you who has a whole city collecting dust.
Information Security Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for information security professionals.
A somewhat related question has already been asked (What would one need to do in order to hijack a satellite?), only at a more abstract level. The question is simple: What practical security lessons should be learned by aviation regulators?
In particular, what are the recommendations on organizing complex system development and security testing over and beyond the procedures already in place? EDIT: Chris Roberts is being grilled by the Feds on alleged hacking of FMS from In-Flight Entertainment boxes. The proper solution is to build proper encryption and authentication measures into the protocol being used.
I'm no pilot, or an aviation expert, but I'm going to stick my neck out on this one and call it a zero substance FUD and an attempt at using our general ignorance on avionic systems as a cheap way of advertising one's so called security expetise.
I've read through the presentation (if reading is a proper term for browsing through a few only seemingly connected slides that don't even care to explain much anything beyond buying stuff off eBay), and I see no evidence of this alleged vulnerability to be a direct threat to aviation safety. The PlaneSploit presentation is about as serious as finding a diagram of this LEGO airplane in the Boeing 747 flight manual.
That said, I would require a bit more than a few presentation slides littered with speculation, to be convinced it presents any real danger.
Aye, can understand your opinion; yet in the presentation there are claims of hacking into the Flight Management System through ACARS (not ADS-B). IMHO: kids with lasers are much more of a threat to aircraft safety than hackers right now, but the situation may change radically.

Not the answer you're looking for?Browse other questions tagged exploit hardware protocols wireless or ask your own question.
Is there a protocol for securely trading information between possibly uncooperating agents? Can the US military seize a country which has the ability to kill anyone based on the victim's name and face? If you have a Lego tail, place it at the rear of the Lego airplane and top it with an eight-dimpled flat piece. There are tugs way better than this one and I do not need OMFG BEST THING EVAR 5,000 STARS!!!! Though one simple idea would be to authenticate traffic on both wireless comms protocols or on the actual plane electronic reporting, something that neither did. Securing the connection between ground control and a plane should be no different from securing any regular connection. In the era of state sponsored cyber attacks (God, I hate that term), resources are no longer an issue. This isn't something novel, the internet has been using such protocols for more than a decade. It requires messages of certain length and the current protocol has very limited bandwidth.
In fact, there's no evidence in the presented documentation that such test system was even assembled, let alone that it would be capable of doing any damage. Of course there is a point in securing any communications, even though it will most certainly add to data overhead. Was not there, so cannot comment on the demonstration (Teso must have been very cautious not to give reasons for legal prosecution by running the exploit in vivo). You will need three 2x8-dimpled Lego pieces, two 1x8 Lego pieces, a 2x2 square and a 2x4 rectangle.
Position this layer one dimpled row back of the layer below it to continue the aerodynamic look.

The current ones that come in LEGO sets are way too small, while this one is too big, but it is some eyecandy to look at.
Sure, I can see how it could be made to work, and potentially short-time (before detected and removed) disturb a few flight related systems. What I wanted to show is that this presented case isn't something a general audience should be worried about. My impression (not a clear conclusion, mind you) was that we're talking about autonomous systems that are merely displayed on same monitors for convenience. Create another layer of flat Legos that extend one dimpled row forward of the layer above it. Obscurity through the fact that having enough resources to mount a feasible attack used to be impractical. This will prevent attackers from simply grabbing the data being sent from the air, modifying it and sending it. These however wouldn't be in any way related to aviation safety, merely a temporary nuisance to supporting logistics.
It can be a nuisance to ground based logistics and support, and it might give pilots something to play with and report potential problems to ground control when they don't have anything better to do. But it most certainly won't make then turn the plane around, turn it into an electrical storm, land at the wrong airport, or even unintentionally forward forged destination weather conditions to their passengers so they disembark the airplane in t-shirts and shorts in the middle of a snow storm. Other, more reliable systems will alert them when the data these tertiary systems are producing are being tempered with, or are otherwise unreliable for whatever reasons.
They can then choose to ignore them, change communications channel, or disable them altogether.

Pontoon boats for sale in bloomington indiana jobs
Wood canoe building plans 8x12
Boat sales muncy pa 17756
Used boat trailers in oregon

Comments to “How to make lego plane landing gear”

  1. Leonardo_DiCaprio  writes:
    Began writing got $30, begin work magazine this month all about.
  2. Dusty  writes:
    Railings from harm when docking leases provide a fantastic "house away from strong, light-weight.