For this reason it is necessary to protect humans from very-high field strengths, which could affect the body, by observing limits to be maintained under all circumstances.
The World Health Organisation (WHO) as well as Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) and the Radiation Protection Commission subordinate to the Federal Environmental Ministry ensures that the valid limits exclude a risk for humans based on independent scientific studies.
These limits are derived from the natural electrical flux in the human body, so that additional stress cannot occur under any circumstances.
Electromagnetic fields, even though invisible, are present everywhere and in every home appliance that we use.
The strength of this magnetic field depends upon the amplitude of current that is flowing, while the amplitude of the current depends upon the voltage applied. Want to find out more information about environmental health risks, or about EHT’s current efforts and projects? The National Education Association believes that all educational facilities must have healthy indoor air quality, be smoke-free, and be safe from environmental and chemical hazards, and from hazardous electromagnetic fields……..
The Association further believes that school districts must inform all stakeholders when changes in their exposure to electromagnetic radiation occur.  Additional health hazards should not be created when facilities are altered or repaired.
In May of 2011 based on the latest research, the World Health Organization classified electromagnetic fields as a Class 2B Carcinogen along with Lead and DDT.  Current FCC guidelines for electromagnetic radiation explicitly do not cover children or pregnant women.
The Association also believes that it is incumbent on local education providers to be forthcoming with  information regarding mold infestation and other indoor environmental hazards in school facilities.
The Association also believes in the establishment and enforcement of standards of the Occupational  Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), including temperature and humidity recommendations, to ensure health and safety. The Association supports ongoing training and certification of education employees who work in  potentially hazardous situations. There is a petition that has been submitted by Devvy Kidd and John Kidd that takes on Texas smart meters because of the health hazards of RF and EMF radiation that come from these devices.
Many people with elderly heart conditions, aging body tissue, and differences in body fluids compared to younger more healthy individuals feel that they are being sacrificed for the sake of technology. For those that have been worried by the health hazards associated with Texas smart meters it has really become a mini-Fukushima for those concerned about radiation dangers. For those looking at this petition from the outside it seems a little much ado about nothing. They looked at whole body exposure from a smart meter and compared it to the dose of an ear from a cell phone. These inaccuracies were exposed by Daniel Hirsch who teaches Nuclear Policy at the University of Santa Cruz.
At the moment no one really knows what the risks could be even with these corrected findings on radiation exposure from smart meters. Like many of us I choose to still use my cell phone although I use a hands free set and keep that thing as far from my head as I can. Consider that tens of millions of people have smart meters on their homes with potentially 100 times greater cumulative full body exposure from RF radiation than they get from their smart phone.
We are an energy consulting company and we make our money from loyal support from people like you.
Let it be cooking in kitchen or rocket propulsion, without electricity, nothing is possible these days. One important thing which is to be noted is electric fields are easily shielded, whereas magnetic fields are not.
The Association also believes in the development and enforcement of health and safety standards specifically for children. According to NEA Policy our employees have the right to know about changes in their environment which may have adverse health effects. The Association further believes that pesticide use should be minimized and, if used, advance notice given of location and date of application. This training must include proper handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials and instruction on Materials Safety Data Sheets (MSDS).
Even people not so frail feel scared by the potential high levels of RF radiation that is being emitted from Texas Smart Meters. The idea that radiation from radio frequency and electromagnetic field energy is sending in daily waves of small X-Ray level radiation bodily exposure is a very frightening prospect.

We know most of us these days have microwave ovens in our houses and yet the smart meter is very small and on the outside of a home.
A microwave uses non-ionizing radiation which does not have the cancer risks associated with it as do X-rays.
The California state legislatures asked for an independent review of the safety of smart meters to be conducted in order to have an unbiased report to look at that was an independent science based study. Rather than comparing the whole body dose of a cell phone and comparing that with the whole body dose from a smart meter they did it much differently with resulted in a significant skewing of results.
He spoke to the California legislature and asked for them to revise the numbers based on these new findings regarding whole body exposure and cumulative exposure. The health risks from RF radiation are uncertain but consider that your microwave oven also uses non-ionizing radiation just as the smart meter does.
When I live in my Tyler Texas home I had no choice on if I would use a smart meter but yet I have one permanently attached on my outside kitchen wall. In several years we may find this has led to a sharp increase in cancers but it could also mean we find that it actually produced no cancers and is perfectly safe.
I would like to keep my smart meter but I would like a retrofit similar to what already comes on my microwave oven. Be sure to use our residential and commercial electric provider and rates compare widget if you would like to help yourself in finding a good provider and know that when you order electric service through our site we earn a commission that keeps us in business so we can continue to spread the knowledge of fake government tax schemes such as the carbon tax.
Associated with electricity, we also have some thing called as Electro Magnetic Fields (EMF), which arise when ever electrical energy is used.
Thus the strength of the electric and magnetic field is an important factor upon which the health of the person is dependant. Most states did little research on these radiation dangers and what research that was done was later found to be originally created by the industry that would profit from these new meters. You can’t compare RF radiation to X-ray radiation as they are two totally different things. This radiation is however still harmful to some low degree and so there are rules about how much radiation leakage can occur in a microwaves life-cycle.
Richard Tell Associates assumed a 100% duty cycle for the smart meter and a 1% duty cycle for a smart phone because you only uses the cell phone for less than an hour during a day on average. The United States Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health regulates the RF radiation of a microwave and I believe they should do so for the smart  meter. Regardless I am still paranoid about smart phone cancer risks and this is only a 45 minute per day exposure risk.
I want to be able to in case or spray on something to my smart meter that keeps RF radiation exposure to 5 milliwatts of microwave radiation per square centimeter at approximately 2 inches from the surface of the smart meter.
In his spare time he enjoys wrestling with his 6 year old son, 3 year old son and our new 20 month old son. It is unbelievable that every household appliance, which works on electricity has electromagnetic field around it and if it exceeds certain range, will definitely cause harm to the human body.
Even though all the appliances are helpful for the comfort of humans, they also cause harmful effects. You would think a little more thought  would have gone into it before mandating almost all Texans get one installed. RF radiation is non-ionizing radiation and does not come with the cancer risks associated with X-ray radiation.
For instance, the microwave is regulated by the FDA to allow for only a very small amount of RF radiation to come out of the device for the entire life-cycle of the microwave oven.
Only 5 milliwatts of microwave radiation per square centimeter at approximately 2 inches from the surface of the oven is allowed by the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. California Council on Science and Technology did not go forward with an independent review but instead reproduced the same claims that the Electric Power Research Institute had made. They never corrected for the enormous comparative difference in usage of 45 minute total cell phone exposure next to the continuous use a smart meter would be on for. A spray on coating and shield backing may be all the retrofits that are necessary to offer the same protection you currently receive against RF radiation exposure as you get from your microwave oven. Geniuses made microwaves safe before they went on store shelves and even then people had a choice to buy it or not.

There may still be dangers especially at higher dosages but lets not get ahead of ourselves and make the comparison with X-ray radiation as it just isn’t the same thing. The FDA has no regulation or criteria for how much RF radiation can be emitted from a smart meter. The problem with this is that the same group PG&E used for their report (Richard Tell Associates) was in charge of producing the report for the Electric Power Research Institute as well. They did not look at cumulative exposure which would make sense because the smart meter is usually attached to your house near a major room and running 24 x 7.
The health dangers could be found to be harmless but it could just as easily be found to be extremely severe. A word of warning about assuming the risks are not great when it comes to non-ionizing radiation: It took years to understand that with ionizing radiation that comes from disasters like Fukashima there is a latent long term danger from cumulative long term exposure that always results in terminal cancer.
But it is very complex to explain such EMF interactions as it varies with the frequency ranges. When looking at my Texas smart meter I could not find any shield or device preventing the release of unwanted amounts of RF radiation into the home and surrounding area. It turns out that Smart Meters also produce the same type of non-ionizing radiation known as RF radiation. There was a table in the EPRI report used by the California council comparing the RF radiation doses from a smart meter, a cell phone, and a microwave oven.
So in the study they assumed 99% of the time the cell phone was not producing radiation but 100% of the time the smart meter would be which is a good assumption and correct for the most part but cumulative exposure was completely left out of the study. The main issue is that currently knowing nothing about the long term health risks of smart meter RF radiation exposure the government is conducting a very large experiment on millions of the population. We do not yet understand what these latent long term cumulative dangers are for non-ionizing radiation that come from devices like the smart meter which is an always on device. If a human body is exposed to such EMFs, the energy is absorbed by the body and thus creates small, very weak, internal electric fields.
This radiation is much much safer than X-ray radiation but it is still potentially dangerous and so precautions are recommended and followed by many product manufacturers with the regulation of the FDA behind it.
They did adjust the smart meter number to 50% exposure as a reasonable adjustment but even still this doesn’t come close to solving the problems with the study. A big part of this experiment is completely involuntary as most Texans don’t remember ever being asked if they are okay with  the new smart meters being installed on their homes and paying that extra $5 a month for the luxury of continuous 24 x 7 RF radiation exposure. There is always a low ball estimate of risks from governments in order to get the mass public to not worry and accept new policy.
The amount of energy absorbed depends on the various factors such as the type of radiation source, distance between the human and the radiation source, and many other factors including the physical characteristics like height etc. When you correct the two major blunders in the study, the whole body and the cumulative aspect of it rather than a cell phone being 100 times more exposure than a smart meter a smart meter shows to be 100 times more cumulative exposure than a cell phone. If you think the smart meter experiment is a big gamble in Texas consider that China will install over 300 million smart meters by the end of 2015. If there is a cancer risk with smart meters it looks like we will all go down with it at the rapid rate these things are being installed. These dosimetric quantities specifications are extremely important in providing the relationship between the EMFs and health effects. These risk estimates always go up over time after the public has already accepted the magic device. Go ahead and do what you need to do to protect yourself from exposure by buying an after market product that can assist with this. The good news is that a retrofit is likely very inexpensive and easy to install to block out the radiation although it may require a little sweat.

Wilderness survival vacations 50
Data center emp protection zone
Free films k2 youtube
Nuclear electronic pulse rifle

Rubric: Electromagnetic Pulse Shield


  1. TT
    Antelope in a group, there appears to be a continual alertness, with via the washing.
  2. jesica_sweet
    Frequencies above 500 MHz assistant Superintendent of Police is satisfied that.