Are you looking for a software to download videos from Top Documentary Films on win, mac, iPad or iPhone?
Easily convert downloaded Top Documentary Films videos for your portable devices like iPad, iPhone, PSP, etc. If you are working on Mac, Mac Video downloader could be the best Top Documentary Films video downloader (For Windows users, you can use GetFLV). Before you begin with GetFLV, you must download the software and install it on your computer.
Video Capture can capture any video with audio from any website by recording directly from your PC screen.
GetFLV isn't cheap, but it's a much better performer than most of the competition, as the free trial shows. As the British and US-led troops get ready to abandon Afghanistan, they leave behind a country in the hands of the Taliban.
Defenseless children are easy target for the Taliban - over two thirds of the kids in the orphanages have lost their parents to the war. After almost 12 years - with the assistance of the world's most capable military forces - the Taliban have still not been crushed. The Afghanistan war was almost won when Bush became overrun with greed and bloodlust and ordered his crusade. Pulling all of the troops out of Afghanistan to illegaly invade Iraq was handing the country back to the Taliban on a plate. Bush's order to Invade Iraq was the single most wasteful irresponsible, cruel and useless military order given since the call to go over the top of the trenches. I hope that Bush can take his rightful place in history as the worst military commander of the 21st century.
Granted fighting against ideologies isn't really a win or lose situation, but you can't deny that Iraq took away resources from the Afghan campaign that could have secured vast areas of the country and reduced them to little more than bands of pirates.
However i accept that my opinions are naive as I also hadn't seen that info on troop numbers, which has utterly blown my mind. I fail to see how that mindless cretin could possibly be the lynch pin in any sort of conspiracy, beyond the conspiracy to lie to Congress and the American people about weapons of mass destruction to justify an illegal war.
To purposely put young children in harms way for your own agenda show a very cowardly mind set.
An inside look shows how ignorance and misinformation leads to easy brainwashing of children. If anyone thinks just packing up the troops will fix all the problems of Afghanistan, then they are extremely misguided. The worst country in the world that exports terrorism is iran and if they get the bomb we are going to see world war 3! Any country with nuclear weapons is a threat and if Iran does develop a nuclear arsenal it joins the league of nations that pose a threat to the rest of the world. Either do some more in depth research or shut the hell up for trying to spread such nonsense, both in regard to Iran and Japan.
So what you are trying to say is that the United States started world war 2 and pearl harbor never happened and I suppose Hitler was a wonderful man and never killed a jew in his life! Okay lets just agree to disagree but both the United States and Iranian governments are not innocent in any ways in dealing with the rest of the world.
No I do realize there was more then just the jews killed in ww2 but I hear so much denial about what happened to the jews in regards to this issue. There are around eight nations with nuclear capabilities and that is eight countries too many.
Ahmadinejad finished his last speech at the United Nations asking Allah to hasten the arrival of the Imam Mahdi. I understand the criticism of America but that doesn't mean that every other country is beyond reproach. The Quran verifies earlier revelations and corrects the influence of man upon earlier writings.
They have done so many illegal invasions of other nations and are forerunners on crimes against humnaity, even theri own citizens. The US used the war on terror to bring back the opium production to levels never seen prior to the invasion. The Taliban eliminated 94% of the opium production and allowed the 6% for medicinal use only pre invasion.
I do hope Iran develops a nuclear weapon(they already have a few) to keep the corrupt Saudi fraud Muslims at bey and to keep the hounds of hell(Israel) from trying to enact an "elitist" attitude of zionism in the area. That sentence as it stands right there now is just another sign of right-wing vacuous though. I notice you even managed to include the 'no true scotsman fallacy' in your short, silly preach. Because you feel an overwhelming need to trumpet the superiority of your imaginary sky daddy above theirs. Edit: Outside of your hangup on skydaddies I could probabaly agree with you on quite a few things relating to US foreign policy. No, I don't like what Israel is doing, but that doesn't mean everyone having weapons like that is a good idea.
Unlike your inference and obvious personal beliefs, a belief in 'God' is not restricted to your Quran and it's BS. I don't think it is good for anyone to have that sort of weaponry, whatever their intentions or beliefs.
I understand the Quran better than you, I can assure you(unless you per chance happen to be an Islamic scholar).
Yes, these weapons are meant for total annihilation of races, but it is a reality and the world we live in. When you have an uneducated populace that knows nothing other than what they are told, it becomes easy to wield great influence.
Just look at what happened to the early Chrisitans that were uneducated and where they are today in the religion because of it. You do not understand the Quran and only use bits and pieces to justify a means to an end like so many others that do not understand.
Sorry that the world has been so cruel to you that you feel you need to argue in this manner.
If you disagree, fine, but the insults make you like a small and resentful person trying to be a bully when you have probably been bullied your entire life. The issue is to try and show that the Christian population early on was largely uneducated and the church fathers led them astray in knowledge on purpose without any way for them to refute what was being told. Many Muslims(educated as well) do not understand the religion of Islam and are guided by those with an agenda.
Ask me something significant if you would like to gain knowledge on a subject you seem to have little of. The fact it speaks of a flat earth, which we now know is completely incorrect, indicates how accurate your claims of it being the 'word of God' are. It proves your claims of 'divine inspiration' are incorrect, which negates the rest of your absurd attempt at ducking the issue. Therefore you are ignorant and really not worth the time to educate on the issue because all you can do is mock something you know nothing about. It's the audacity of starting up a 'best religion' battle in the comments section of a doc like this one that absolutely f--king floors me when it comes to understanding. All you are looking for is to get into a slanderous and mocking argument over who can insult the other more and be savy about it. If you guys want to talk on an educated level without the insults, then hey let's do it and perhaps we all can learn something from it.
Secondly, how dare you push your mindless drivel in the comments section of such a serious topic and then try changing the issue. Thirdly, outside of countering your drivel here I wouldn't cross the street to piss on you if you were on fire. Grab a good pair of binoculars and climb onto your roof, I'll climb onto mine and wave to you.. I understand the Qu'ran well enough to know it makes incorrect statements and claims, and also contains messages of hate and instructions of violence within it. There is no benefit in trying to teach one with closed mind and black spot on their heart such as you. His crud was called out, he thought he'd get smart and ask for examples, obviously thinking he wouldn't get any. I will give him one thing, he didn't try to claim the Qu'ran doesn't talk of a flat earth as most of them do. The really sad thing is that not once did he honestly address the issue of the kids in this doc in any genuine way.
Some day, when I grow up, I hope to have the same awesome tolerance for this kind of mega-bullsh*t that you seem to have.
I say the United States needs to take care of business at home and screw the rest of the world! Don, check the comments policy, your caps-lock rant is out of line, and doesn't make you any more correct.
I'm no fan of the Japanese in that time, my grandfather fought them in New Guinea, I have inherited his medals. It's not only the Taliban that does that, a good mate of mine has had the misfortune to experience first hand child soldiers, that were put in that position by their own Muslim father. Of course the Quran recommends God's revelation during the time of Jesus, but God tells the Muslims to be weary of what He gave no authority to while reading it. Jesus is reveared by the Muslims as a divine prophet of God and they as well believe in his eminent return. The claims in the bible as Jesus being God in the flesh here as His son are additions by man.
If Allah did not preserve the Bible from corruption, then Allah was stupid and shortsighted to recommend it so many centuries ago. The Quran corrects in Arabic(for it is sealed in this language) all revelation of the past. It is direct in it's message and God tells us if we want in depth understanding of what He reveals in the Quran, we can find it in earlier revelations to His prophets. Even in Arabic, the Koran has Allah recommending the Bible even though the Bible presents Jesus as more than the prophet that the Koran says he is. What you are proving to me is that you have not studied the Quran except for what Christian fundamentalist have directed you to attack of Islam. Where did the trinity concept come from and do you adhere to the KJV of the bible as the majority do? The Quran says to leave the unbelieving and those that mock to their own devices and that God will deal with you upon Judgement Day of that which you reject. He gives you enough rope and time in this world to choose wisely and then eventually He withdraws this from you and leaves you to wander. This is when Satan sees you as easy prey and you succumb to this world as you will succumb to a terrible fate unknown to humans in this world during the next life.
Do you have anything relevant to say bunny man that could contribute to a meaningful dialogue? You'd have to start a meaningful dialogue first, all you've done is try to preach and put down others.
The trinity was added by man at thend of the 4th CE and spearheaded by Athanasius(arch bishop of Alexandria). He was also repsonsible for deciding what 27 books made up the canon of the 100"s that were out there. Damn the both of you for having a 'who's religion stinks the most' argument in a topic about child soldiers. They want the invaders to their homeland gone and that is the only thing I can have sympathy with them about. Sick pigs, the lot of you condoning this barbaric behaviour against innocent people, especially the children. Now, science has evolved to the point where hard facts and evidence may be able to provide us with answers instead of philosophical theories. After reading your comment with Randy's interpretation, it is no wonder your comments are being screened, Vlatko is prob upset with you. I have still not watched the last two parts, but I think I can allow myself to ask you to please explain why is this semi-scientific information in your opinion?
The scientist who was apparently considered a loony among his peers for his ideas and turned out to be right about planets in other solar systems, should teach a lesson anybody to be careful with exclusive statements.
My son once asked me "who would you most like to have read a story to you if you were blind" my answer was Morgan Freeman, this is just an awesome series, thankyou so much for sharing it.
I have been watching that kind of thoughtful movies but never came across that sort of fantastic science-beyond themes that are about us and universe, it is really mind-blowing series. One thing I really love about this series is the clever analogies they come up with in order to explain complex topics. Lacking a degree in advanced mathematics, I had trouble understanding the issues involved in Leonard Suskind's resolution to Hawking's Black Hole Information Paradox. Additionally, the explanation of the HIggs Field given in "What are we madde of" is just brilliant. Perhaps the "Big Bang" was actually the result of the last 2 surviving black holes consuming each other in the previous universes life. I'm not sure if you're already aware (since you posted three months ago) but a second just premiered last Wednesday on the Science Channel in the US.
I heard a very wise comment once: The universe is only one of countless trillions--and they're all a simultaneity at infinity!
Ilyas, buddy you have no idea how happy I am to read that you are a Pakistani, I am also a Pakistani living in US. Morgan Freeman's narration is astute and the little inklings of his personal experiences throughout the series makes it seem a bit more impactful too. The reason they used Morgan Freeman, is because he is a firm believer in extraterrestrial life, and is also a very smart man. For anyone reading this, everything written so far is not meant to make you feel depressed or sad.
So where do we go from here now that we have faced some of the most basic realities of our existence? 2) Purpose is also a very strong feeling that people experience in life, and one that helps them reason out why they need to live or why they are here.
3) Ego - out of all the emotions that all living creatures experience including us humans, Ego seems to be the one emotion that is directly tied to ones desire to live. It's the one emotion that spawns the possibility that we are more than what we appear to be, and it is the one emotion that has spawned cult leaders and dictators.
For those of you who have someone in your life who is strugling with depression or who is sad, instead of telling them that you love them, let them also know that you are proud of them, and tell them why and on a regular bassis. Why are people making metaphysical and nihilistic comments on a scientific albeit cosmological documentary series. If you believe in meta and quantum physics then how can you say there isnt a GOD or higher power? It looks to me like your deep thoughts reflect the way you see the world through your life experiences. Always has been, never can be created or destored, all that ever was,always will be,alwaysmoveing into form,though form and out of form.
Dude I smoked DMT and was god for 5 minutes, therefore god exists hahaha Michael, you silly b**tard =p I like your ambition though..
We suffer from more than just an economic deficit in this country, we suffer from an educational one as well.
The majority of people born and raised in the US are happy with just one language and i suspect many can't spell it right either.
Just to play devils advocate but if you would have told that to Albert Einstein or many other free minded thinker's throughout history, chances are we would still be on one continent thinking the world is flat. Being smart or a genius to me is being able to apply your knowledge and be creative with it. To have high IQ, helps to absorb knowledge and sort it, but doesn't necessarily mean you going to make it big.
Since I'm older than anyony here, some day I'll tell you how it all started, that is the human's real start. Edit - Season 1 episode 1 was removed by viacom someone pay them and get it back up i wanted to watch it again.
Sam Ma if u are religious i would like to make a question for all religious and radical religious ppl in world.Why god gave us an IQ and a mind wich is as logical as to suspect on the exictense on god?? I have absolutely loved this TV show ever since my co-worker showed me it for the first time. An Al Jazeera production, Enemy of Enemies: The Rise of ISIL attempts to retrace the stratospheric rise of the bloodthirsty terrorist organization, and speculate on the severe consequences that may still lie in their wake.
A panel of experts from three different continents - including the former Iraq Minister of Defense Ali Allawi and National Security Advisor Mowaffak al-Rubaie - provide the majority of the film's informed commentary.
Destabilization in the region reached a turning point with the rise of Islamic militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a figure who was previously regarded as an innocuous presence at best. Throughout this unfortunate string of events, the perception of the United States and their role in the region began to transform on all sides.
Enemy of Enemies: The Rise of ISIL provides valuable insights into the origins of one of the most defining conflicts of our time.
What do you call a country that has killed millions of innocent civilians, including the burning alive of thousands with 400,000 tons of napalm? The fact that the US has a bloodthirsty history does not mean that the description cannot be applied to ISIL. Nobody has ever beaten a criminal charge in court by pointing out that there are worse offenders. American private military contractor 'Black water' plays a major role in producing the ISIL??. One thing we really have to realize that where the terrorists could have gotten the weapons either they made themselves or getting from western allies like America,Britain, France etc.. They maintain a good relationship with terrorists for their selfishly businesses on the other hand ? they called blood thirsty terrorist. I've got to wonder about the truth of this documentary since they are not offering it to be viewed in the US. Too busy to learn WHY there is a Syrian refugee crisis but not to busy to shout "Not in MY backyard". Until "we" decide to elect those who strive for world peace not those who strive for world domination the status quo will continue.
If you want to know where they came from, just look at who benefits from their actions: Israevil and the international intelligence community. The confusion about our changing weather sequences and how they influence global forecast is somewhat justifiable. Temperature variations due to changing weather circumstances all over the world can be very big. Kind of a watered down documentary, but it does provide some convincing reasons to believe humans are affecting the climate. Unfortunately, government doesn't seem to want to subsidize a solution so that people will find alternative energy supplementation to be attractive. When Walmart begins selling alternative power products in their stores, then we will know the costs are low enough for the average working person. The survey considered the work of some 29,000 scientists published in 11,994 academic papers. No, most of the media is in the pockets of the corporations, hence the ignorance akin to what you display. Yes, the corporations who pollute and contribute to climate problems and whose best interests would be to DENY global warming, not support it. At least I won't feel guilty with off-springs facing the problems created by our generations. Listen I drive a 35 year old Mercedes and have been for the last 30 years I keep it fully serviced, if I was to buy a new car every 3-5 years how much energy would that consume! Those who deny global warming can be liken to a guy I once new in high school.Who at 38 is still living with his parents and spends most of his time laying around the house playing with him self and watching re-runs of the three stooges. That's real special you can just lump everyone into a group called "deniers" and dismiss them but there are many facets of people who are merely pointing out that this has been promoted by entities with dubious motives whose "solutions" are anything but. For my part I'm not bowing down to leftists who were just looking for political capital and don't care that every scheme proposed stands to worsen the problem. BTW if you still know that guy in high school that doesn't speak highly of you or the people you associate with. If soothing your personal guilt is your motivation you're only offering another example of why people have questioned the science.
Well that sounds great but what if by the time it went from good intents to policies perverted by others with bad intents, the things you thought would fix that problem only made it worse? Deny as you like, the fact is since the inception of Kyoto global GGE have not only risen but so has the rate of their rise. Can you provide figures on how many of those experts would see continued funding for their research if they agreed to a consensus that their research was no longer necessary? It doesn't mean they were undecided, it means they were not mandated to find the cause but get the scientific facts about what is going on. If you mean they falsified their reports, I think you are the one that need to provide proof.
Their research was peer-reviewed before being published, you might want to look into that process.
All the scientific publications are also cited on page 4 of the same article with online sources. However if the other proxy methods involve measuring carbon data in deep ice samples heritage tree rings and pulling carbon molecule data out of these maybe it would be a stronger linkage to say the fact is this or that. When they changed the "Global Warming" scare to the meaningless and unverifiable" Climate Change" - they gave the game away. Yeah right, the 3560 ARGO buoys distributed across all the oceans of the planet are lying about the temperature they record. I think the climate change deniers get their information from mainstream media exclusively.
It's probably because the climate scientists came up with such overwhelming evidence that climate change really exists. If you made a documentary on ocean pollution for example, would you interview a neurosurgeon, geneticist or paleontologist because they said it doesn't exist or is caused by meteorites falling from the sky? I find it disturbing that people have been trained not to think critically because there's always an "expert" around to do the thinking for them.
If the four percent is absorbing the light rays as they bounce or deflect back into space - changing the light energy into heat energy then yes this causes an increase in the ambient air temp? I would suspect that any excessive amount of carbon in the air will cause an ionization (increased lighting storms - as the result of) ?
I am more concerned with the displacement of fresh water around the world in order to bottle water for sale etc.
Not to mention - "coke" sucking up our Global water to make soft drinks - and thus farmers in India have no water to water their crops - ? Of course they don't get fired, are you denying that if a scientific consensus were reached that determined AGW was not happening, funding for AGW research would not drastically be reduced- if not virtually evaporate completely? As for peer review process, Climategate gave us clear evidence many have sought to both rig it and drum opposition out of the field. The fact remains the name was changed from Global Warming to Climate Change purely for marketing and PR propaganda reasons. A consensus of scientists who have studied the portentous anthropogenic data support its conclusions. Hypothesis: Climate change (beyond what is normal for earth) is actually real, and humanity's actions are the primary cause of it. To verify this with true scientific analysis, we must first find a model for comparison (outside the earth) that does not have human influence. Example: We have had orbiters around Mars for well over 20 years, and in that time we have observed it's polar caps receding at a rate comparable to that of the earth. Note: This conclusion does not preclude that all changes in earth's climate are sun related, only that the primary one is not humanity. Question 1: What can we say, (with certainty) is humanity contributing towards climate change? As stated in the documentary, we know that CO2 emissions have dramatically risen in the last 100 years. Causes: industrial revolution and associated emissions, declining forestry, and increased human population.
Although this is a dramatic change, CO2 is the tiniest contributor of greenhouse gases, far behind water vapor, and methane. Note: None of this is a dismissal of scientific evidence regarding CO2 emissions, it's impact on the biosphere, or the validity of the information itself. Since it is fair to say that few people would deny the impact our species has had poisoning our environment, and the biosphere, what can we really do to change our behaviour? 2) We can influence the situation, but we will never be able to change the course of humanity itself.
None of these are desirable, (understatement) but are the only thing capable of interrupting the powers at be from their present course, and reducing human populations to a level that the world can contend with. Although this is all doom and gloom at it's best, there is possibilities, but they go completely against our nature.
I apologize if all this is too depressing for everyone, or creates unnecessary fear, but in reality, it is no different then telling everyone to be 'environmentally friendly' or else; especially when the average person is really quite powerless within the present matrix we are governed by. Sadly, those who are here for a good time, not a long time, have decided to enjoy themselves at everyone else's expense, and if we become like Richard Cheney and 'join the dark side', then we quickly forget our responsibility to what matters most.
On a positive note, nature is a self correcting system, and there is a strong likelihood that humanity has itself gone through cycles we are unaware of. So, if you wish to make a difference, you have to fight the good fight, put evil where it belongs, (out of power) and have endless vigilance to make sure that it never gains control again. P.S: Evil is unbound, and without rules, and only deems continuous growth as value, on a planet with finite resources, ergo insane!

Even if everybody stops having children, it will take at least a generation for population to reduce in great numbers and the emissions already in the atmosphere will also take a long while to get absorbed back into the earth.
Also, on an unrelated topic in your post, the sun doesn't have enough mass to go supernova. It is unprecedented in the past 8000 years but is on par with a similar event 9000 years ago. In view of these facts, I don't think it's logical to attribute the current climate change principally to solar activity fluctuations. I do appreciate your optimism though, (a good thing) and often find myself struggling between the idealist, (the potentiality of what could be) and reality of what really is.
No, I don't think Universities across the globe would get rid of their climatology units if a scientific consensus was reached.
The "climategate" concerned 1 institution, the University of East Anglia's (UEA) Climatic Research Unit (CRU) in November 2009.
There were 2 public investigations (House of Commons and Sir Muir Russell for UEA) and 1 independent investigation by Fred Pearce. Even if you ignore the 66% that did not express a position, only 83 out of 4000 (0.7%) that did express a position published a clear definite dispute that climate change is not caused by humans. I agree with your final statement and would suggest greenhouse gases are a large contributor but won't jump to blame human generated CO2 when so many that do have consistently ignored solar variation and the related issues of methane gas releases and undisclosed releases of industrial sourced GG.
As I said solar variation alone does not explain the current warming, what's happened is likely a residual effect that's driving CO2. What bothers me most is the attitude "we've got to do something, anything, now" being promoted recklessly by ideologues and grasped by policymakers at the UN and leaders of third world countries looking to profit over this. The result will be a plummeting of standards of living in industrialized nations, a transfer of conventional polluting industries to third world countries who will not regulate them as they were here, and one big cesspool of a polluted earth as third world countries were given a free pass to harm the world as industrialized nations used to. I don't have the figures in front of me but methane gas content in the atmosphere has risen drastically since the mid 19th century.
Equally to blame was Bill Clinton's bizarre pro-China commerce policies and overly restrictive environmental regulations.
Note one of those Clinton policies was booking trade junkets to mainland China for corporate CEOs who were solicited for campaign contributions for plane seats on these junkets. Yeah and we can naturally expect that since ideologies drive people's desire to publish their views, those who chose to promote their position would be skewed toward approving it. The fact is that study used flawed methodology and presented its conclusions dishonestly trying to minimize those flaws. Furthermore the overall tone of these people is that they are on a mission to silence and minimize dissent, and that calls into question whether they are acting scientifically at all. I think you're avoiding admitting an uncomfortable point by again answering the question a different way than asked. If a consensus were reached that AGW were not happening why would governments and corporations fund any research on the matter when there are so many other pressing issues?
If your job were to conclude whether or not your job needed to exist, what would your work look like? Taken in addition to the probability ideologues would select this field in college with the idea they could save the planet because they believe man was harming it, it's hard to imagine these people are ever going to be objective. These things must be considered if we're going to be fair about oil corporations affecting research. I can think for myself and many in the scientific community were appalled by their behavior.
Furthermore if AGW is happening the policies alleged to mitigate it have been promoted by ideologues with confused and often self defeatist intentions and entities who wish to personally gain. In view of the current evidence though, it does exist so I have no idea how it would go away all of a sudden without a global scientific conspiracy to manipulate thousands of climate related peer-reviewed scientific papers in the past 20 years. We homo sapiens poked some big holes in the layer of protective ozone in the stratosphere, in a short length of time.
My understanding is that water vapor has an atmospheric cycle of 9 days so it cycles the heat out of the atmosphere quite quickly and it forms clouds that reflect a good portion of the solar radiation back to space. On the other hand, CO2 has a variable atmospheric lifetime of 30 to 95 years so each additional molecule in the atmosphere will radiate heat back to the surface for a long time and CO2 has no albedo. Albedo is the reflective property of clouds and ice, the vast frozen islands that once covered the Arctic and bounced a lot of radiation back into space or onto co2; but, at least it bounced it rather than absorbed it as liquid h2o does. There is every logical reason to conclude the current consensus was reached through ideological and job security motivated "conspiracy"- which requires no secret pacts or any of that. This is why climate change research does not justify the special consideration given other fields of scientific research, in that everyone who pursued the field had to be a true believer to make that choice. The most obvious example being people like the (former) NASA scientist James Hansen, who fits the "environmentalism as my religion" mold.
I'm sure the European Union activists who feared an Exxon Valdez in their waters can sleep well at night knowing their push to ban single hulled tankers virtually overnight overwhelmed the salvage industry when it rendered 2500 registered hulls obsolete. I don't argue that there are extremists like James Hansen on both side of the climate change debate but there is a large consensus amongst thousands of climate scientists that the current global warming is mostly man made.
See there you go trying to place this issue above any discussion of bias by merely using the word "scientist". It's as if you consider these people robots, or believe people choose their careers and life's work randomly, without any concern over what that life's work might be accomplishing. It's hardly a surprise people pursue careers in cancer research to make their life's work mean something. As for the analogy being irrelevant, just google "environmentalism as religion" and Hansen, their poster child, can hardly be dismissed as an extremist- in fact as one of the more powerful figures in it all the fact nobody saw anything wrong with an ideologue in that position reveals how many people are blind to this problem. The human population growth 8k years ago with the start of the agricultural revolution and civilization--allowed humans to survive: the numbers of humans to increase, steadily but slowly, relative to the 19th C.
My sense is that you are talking about the population "explosion" and the corresponding co2 upsurge due to the sharp, prolonged glut of industrial processes using toxic carbon when burnt as fossil fuel.
On conditions found in Nazi concentration camps in Germany and Belgium by advancing Allied Armies during World War II.
I Lost My Job is a documentary film which sets out to explore the phenomenon which is affecting and due to affect many people's lives - namely, technological unemployment. Of all the images the name Genghis Khan brings to mind, that of a visionary who brought literacy, law and culture to his people rarely springs to mind. The story of how Homo sapiens once shared the Earth with other species of hominid, and how, against all the odds, we survived.
If we follow that analogy, gaining knowledge through several senses simultaneously is better than through just one. There are less than 300 Rothschild Giraffes left, in the whole of Africa and their numbers continue to decline. The writings of Oliver Sacks and others have shown us that we can learn much about ourselves by looking closely at the deficits shown by people with neurological problems. In early times, evil spirits were thought to possess people and make them act in strange and frightening ways. Overall at Top Documentary Films you can find thousands of stunning, eye-opening and interesting documentaries. Choose one that suits your interest through navigation system of TDF, watch it, and tell us how it was through comments. You knowingly lie to your audience and you knowingly try to keep them from the truth and you try to keep them from learning the serious peril this nation and this planet is in. Alex Jones, a celebrity radio host, and underground cult hero, is the main character of the film.
Of all the hundreds of sources, really thousands total out there, Alex is the big thing that it all orbits around, which he hates.
These five conspiracy theorists are leaving Austin, Texas traveling up to Dallas to the site of the 1963 assassination of John F. They're standing there in the center lane of Elm Street exactly where the presidential limousine was and if you turn and look up at the 6 foot windows, what was the school book depository, you'll see that you can't get a line of sight because a tree intervenes. Ok, opening with the obvious fact that the tree that currently obscures any possible sniper's view from the book depository would not have even been there 60 years ago was, in the least, a bit stupid. To summarise, it turns out that the American Government is possibly the greatest hypocrisy of all time.
You must have noticed that they have no real warmth, no humanity nor any those other things that we clearly see in our friends, colleagues or even friendly passers-by.
If you are psychotic and have a craving for power you'll focus and easily get it because the rest of us are too busy with the good things like being nice, loving and considerate people. Being nice, and having others know that you are nice, and respecting and admiring you for that and the good things you do is all a person needs. I guess one reason would be to put the truth ahead of your dislike of a man's passionate qualities.
This entire documentary, while having some interesting points, much of it can be debunked by simply reading a little more on the subject.
Also I agree that the government is a bunch of arseholes, but why are more people not angry about the lack of healthcare, the revolving door problem that is at the heart of much of the wider systemic problems in the US and Europe.
Fight the man, yes, but please can we kick him where it hurts and not just add to the bulls*it by flapping about like a mad man. He also shows the negative side of conspiracy theory in a big way, and actually does the opposite of helping unveil the shite. BUT what I think is the main issue here is asking questions, and having the right to ask questions without getting arrested on some made-up charges when the questions become too uncomfortable. What makes me quite negative towards the ?truth movement? though is that they demand the rights to ask these questions, in a scientific way (which is good and all), while a lot of them are religious. So "Being nice, and having others know that you are nice, and respecting and admiring you for that and the good things you do is all a person needs." What about money?
Anyways, If you've seen one Alex Jones blowfest you've seen them all so you'll know before you watch this whether you'll like it or not. I?m not saying you?re wrong, but linking to a wikipedia that is opinionating and not being unbiased doesn?t give your statement much credibility either. Quote: ?He was also elected President of the United States in 1960, besting the arguably more qualified (although insane), but far less attractive Richard M.
But being a huge MMA fan he has grown tremendously on me since he came into the UFC, and continue to do so. If you don?t want to see the whole interview, skip to about 43 minutes in, and it shows the mutual respect between these 2 guys, which actually brought some more respect towards A. But I am in no way saying that anyone else who prefers dominance and power IS a psychopath. Jezus F'ing Chris, Jim Marrs is at the spot that JFK was shot and states there's a tree in the way of the line of site from where the shooter was. As I wrote in my first post; the main issue for me is that these topics get adressed, and can be adressed without people having to fear repercussions. I?m not sure if it was CNN or some other network that is owned by General Electric, who in it?s turn have multi-billion dollar defence contracts. And not being backed by a huge network it seems very hard to get the word out there, even if your intentions as a journalist are good. The annoying thing which sticks in the craw of Alex Jones, is that a lot of more rational Americans agree with Piers Morgan, and not this tub thumper for the Whitewash the White House institute, the unconscionable National Rifle Association. After annihilating the American Indian, all Americans have to turn against, with their 320 million firearms, is each other, and innocent wildlife. And I'm not sure why they'd go to the Cooks Islands anyway - you can't buy property there unless you were born there so their money is no good to them. I like this video, and i totally believe that this New World Order stuff is absolutely true.
The democrat party is being used as a vehicle to push this agenda along and the biggest obstacle in their path is Christians so now there is an increasing push to discredit Christians, persecute Christians in the U.S.
And it's none of the world's business that Americans shoot 30,000 of their citizens every year, thanks to the merchants of the 2nd Amendment. You should do some research on the effects of gun bans in other countries because it has NOT decreased violent crime. Well I?m not sure I believe that Christians are being persecuted in your country, but I agree with you on the rest of it.
Look, I?m a Liberal and you sound like a conservative, but I imagine that you?d be surprised as to how much we could agree on. You know I just want to say one other thing I hope you and others will consider even for an instant.
Go on and keep covering your eyes, put your finger in one of the millions of holes in the dyke, and watch your reality tv programs. Alex Jones is not the one to listen to, try Alan Watt, this is far from not being true, just the wrong messenger.
The Line of Demarcation was an imaginary division of territory on the Earth at 50 degrees longitude, which was used to separate the boundaries of Portugal and Spain made in the year 1493. In short The Line OF Demarcation, divided the non-European world into two trading and exploration zones one for Spain and one for Portugal. Pretty ironic though,how some of these are fighting the government (which I am all for), because they don't wanna be controlled, and they hate liars.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but Russia, England France Prussia, Italy and the Ottomans didn't go along with it did they! You can call them nut jobs if you like but before you discount all of this you might want to do some serious research first.
People don't like being lied to, which is why when you tell them that they have been by the one thing they thought they could trust the most, they refuse to accept it.
No matter how obvious the lie is, most will not accept it because they can't simply comprehend the effect that lie will have on them, Everything they have been told is a lie, their world will come crushing down on them.
According to the Official White House report, Bush had learned that the 2nd plane had hit the tower when he was inside the classroom. 3 months later he said that he had seen the plane hit the building on TV when he was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in and made a joke about it saying ;'there's one terrible pilot'. Nobody saw the first plane hit the tower on TV on the day of the attack, The footage of the first plane hitting the tower wasn't shown until the next day. And why would the news be showing the Twin Towers randomly before an attack had even happened?
Maybe you heard 'in New Zealand' because you approached this video with a biased opinion and you wanted to debunk his theories and not believe what you were being told? Oh and the Cook Islands is in free association with NZ, they are hardly as disconnected as you make it out to be.
People don't get that, what they are doing every day, is for all those people who died beacuse of the government. You can call them crazy, but who will be crazy, when the government comes to your house to take away your family? I believe the Kennedy assassination was sponsored by people in our own government, but come on. Edward Snowden- revealed government secrets to the public at large, was forced to flee the US and is now hiding in Russia.
Alex Jones- reveals "government secrets" to the public at large and has a $5million a year business and celebrity career off the back of it. Someone who chooses to believe in the existence of a spiritual being, doesn't show that they are being controlled, or having their freedoms taken away from them. Some people simply choose to believe in the existence of an afterlife, because it makes them feel better about the idea of death, and makes them feel safe, or happy.
Unless of course you're talking about those extremists, which, I agree, has nothing to do with weather these people are christian or not.
If religion didn't exist, they could still just as well be psychopathic extremists using some other excuse to justify their actions. Being christian doesn't destroy your credibility when trying to present evidence for something unrelated to Christianity. You say religion doesn't drive people to murder, yet all of human history seems to disagree with you.
So, a no n, Alex is a liar because he's successful at what he does?Maybe.Lying won't guarantee success and success doesn't guarantee a liar, but he seems pretty open about to discussion and questions. You think this kind of all powerful organisation exists, but at the same time you believe they aren't powerful enough to silence a dimwit like Jones? Nothing is that simple, Jones is part of it, they do want info to be leaked in a controlled manner, that way people are not shocked when it happens, because they already knew to expect it.
Think logically here, no network would be randomly filming the Twin Towers 'live' before an attack had even taken place. The point is that popular pressure, up to and including armed revolution, can affect government. I'm no expert either but the Arizona ash in my front yard went from a 3 ft high sapling to a mature 50 ft high tree in less than 20 years. It's a bit insulting to be told to think logically by someone who is talking utter nonsense. A belief in any one group controlling the world seems unlikely now since the entire planet is slowly being poisoned by large, daily doses of radioactive elements such cesium, strontium, etc. Please tell me you understand now, because I am not going to explain a simple point to you three times, because that my friend would be nonsense. Sorry buddy but everything you've said is based solely on personal assumption and not in fact. In the article, 2 methods are provided, and both of the methods could be extend to other video sharing websites.
Buffering video: If your net speed is slow or inconsistent, you can try to pause the video for a while before capturing it.
And the next generations aren't merely blameless observers of the continuous war- some of them have also become contributors. Some agree to give up their lives, others are strained - but they are all Afghanistan's Taliban generation.
Neaz's family was murdered when their village was bombarded by the coalition forces in an attempt to kill hiding rebels. One thing that must be done: show how internally inconsistent the Koran is and then show why, because of that, it cannot be the word of God.
It is a proven fact that Iran exports terrorism and the Iranian people are controlled by their government! If my information is dribble as you say then Iran's government must be wonderful and anyone can stand up to them in their country and not be persecuted!
As far as bombing Japan near the end of world war 2 Japan was not going to surrender and why should the United States lose more soldiers in invading Japan. Dribble, but I say whether in the positive or the negative the discourse when a discussion of WW2 is involved focuses primarily on the Jews, as you have so nicely pointed out and not on the many "others" and their stories. If you'd bothered reading any of his past posts you wouldn't have need to ask that obvious question.
Policy on TDF says i can't tell you what I really think of you but you seriously need to go away and think about this conversation for a while.
What epiphany is ever so important that you feel an irresistible urge to waddle into a shared time of reflection and cram it in someone elses facehole, throat and ears.
All he has done here is perpetuate a notion that the extremists on that side are every bit as bastardish as we tend to think they are.
If it was not for us depending on what part of europe you are from you would either be dead or speaking german! Allah is not God because the Bible (the only word of God) presents God as a trinity of persons, not as a solitary being. And the concept may be arrived at by observing that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are each presented as having attributes particular to God.
Hosted by Morgan Freeman, Through the Wormhole will explore the deepest mysteries of existence - the questions that have puzzled mankind for eternity.
Through the Wormhole will bring together the brightest minds and best ideas from the very edges of science - Astrophysics, Astrobiology, Quantum Mechanics, String Theory, and more - to reveal the extraordinary truth of our Universe. Einstein’s Theory of Relativity says that time travel is perfectly possible — if you’re going forward. Everywhere we look, life exists in both the most hospitable of environments and in the most extreme.
Our understanding of the universe and the nature of reality itself has drastically changed over the last 100 years, and it’s on the verge of another seismic shift.
In the premiere episode of the second season of Through the Wormhole, Morgan Freeman dives deep into this provocative question that has mystified humans since the beginning of time. For most of our history, we’ve rested easy in the notion that there were three dimensions that have existed throughout time: length, width and height. Sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch are the tools most of us depend on to perceive the world.
With the help of massive machines called particle accelerators, scientists studied the subatomic realm and made discoveries about the forces that operate at that level.
If you are referring to the fact that it is mostly hypothesizing, then you must know that hypothesis is a part of the scientific method. Like, the BB may not the only explanation of the readings we are getting through our instruments, although it is the most acceptable so far, but there may, just may be other explanations." Most accepted by who?
BB stands for Big Bang here and, as a theory of the early development of the Universe, is so far the most acceptable explanation of the beginnings according to the majority of the relevant scientific community. The doc offers insight into alternative theories, I didn't hear any one of them claiming these as facts.
The region (Pakistan)i belong to now a days is in the grip of terrorism and religious fanaticism hardly people watch that sort of staff.
But I love God and I love cyber-technology and I could not disagree more vehemently to many of the tenants proposed in this episode. How dare the script writers presuppose our individual conceptions of God or place 'requirements' on that existence? That's a posit faithful to its premise in the extreme and in one way it's right: as far as AI goes, in my opinion it's all or nothing.
I don't know whether this knowledge has made you question your very belief, it certainly did for me. Just the fact that it realistically tries to cover these topics makes it a worthy intellectual escapade.
He chose to do these shows, because he is just as interested in the topics as you, me and everyone else who's commented on here so far.
Cause there is defiantly a body and a spirit because i have left my body and was in the form of pure consciousness. Well, I'm happy to say that I don't share your views, which by the way, are pretty negative whether you realize it or not. I REALLY hope you are foreign because that may be an excuse for your butchering of the language.
This is a great site, very informative, at times challenging, at others funny, always something new and often addictive. There is plenty of meaning to be found in one's immediate situation and in the world as it currently is.
According to their consensus, the United States invasion of the Iraq, and the subsequent toppling of Saddam Hussein, planted the foundation from which the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant could be born. Declaring dogged allegiance to the philosophies of Osama Bin Laden, Al-Zarqawi inspired the ire of the United States with a series of videotaped beheadings of its captured citizens, and managed to detonate a level of civil war in the region through his mass bombings of sacred landmarks. Were they liberators, as their leaders insisted them to be, or were they facilitators of a new realm of mayhem? It is only through an understanding of where we've been that we may be able to determine where we go from here. Could the people from a country that is innocent of not killing other people please be the first to start pointing fingers?
Is that because they are saying something that is untrue and they don't want to be called out on it? It seems really suspicious, because maybe there IS something in it that someone doesn't want the American people to know about, perhaps something like where exactly did ISIL's first funding come from?
Why don't all the so called good Muslims come out and say that they don't support this type of terrorist activity? Ignorance is one thing but willful ignorance should be unacceptable to those who espouse the ideals of freedom and democracy. So how do scientists react to the popular understanding, that climate is really unstable but that it's a natural rhythm?
There is a company that will install a solar energy system on people's house for free, sell the energy to the power company and reduce the home owners energy bill as a benefit.
From now on i'll be up voting every single comment of my own, just to keep that rating high and sustain my delusion of grandeur. Consider climate change research only seeks to confirm its own need to exist and conclusions contrary to that place them out of work- and most of the people who pursued that line of research in college would have done so because they were already convinced of man's guilt in harming the planet. To be specific the UN and a lot of entities involved are more interested in enacting global socialism which inherently seeks to industrialize third world populations by paving roads, and bringing electricity and other luxury infrastructure to areas that didn't have it before.
Wouldn't we all like to have that kind of opportunity for job security to conduct research that only seeks to validate the need for more funding for it- and hide behind the facade of "science" if anyone dares question it.
What they did was only looked at papers that took a position on climate change and extrapolated those papers only to be the overall position of scientists on climate change. They couldn't appeal to people's fears whenever there was a cold snap or blizzard, so figured if they called it Climate Change they could use their cheap tactics whenever any variation in the weather was happening. First, I really enjoyed this documentary, and it actually delves into all the relevant issues regarding climate change. Since I am sure that the vast majority of people will agree with me that we are NOT to blame for this, than it is reasonable to conclude that the primary impact on both planets weather patterns is the sun itself, and factors related to it.
Thus, how much change in the levels of water vapor, and methane have occurred in the same time period? In other words, how do we act as a global collective to mitigate changes for everyone's well being?
Yet the current concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere were last found during the Pliocene over 3 millions years ago. The mass is insufficient for a super nova, but will more likely shed mass with thermal pulses as it converts from a red giant to a white dwarf. Maybe climate change will reduce the population but killing everybody is a hard task given all mankind survived so far with much less population and minimal means of survival. This is why I say they've waffled (as the primary scientist in this study, Solanki, had come out some years ago and blamed solar variation for the bulk of warming) as on one hand they suggest a conclusion solar variation can not fully explain warming BUT also conclude they don't have enough data to make a conclusion.

A runaway loop, the poles melt, methane is released, the poles melt more, the planet warms, causing CO2 rises, etc.
Just because the rise in CO2 is more drastic than the other factors does not mean it's the culprit when CO2 is also driven by warming.
Just like people don't get on the internet and rant about how happy they are with companies but sure do when they get ripped off by them. If AGW were declared to be not happening the majority would be looking for a new line of work in a pretty short time, when contracts for existing research ended.
This is a unique problem to this line of science, proving something is a problem that needs to be studied or should be forgotten about. Everyone's got some stake in this and it's not just Shell and Exxon that are worthy of distrust. I know the specific issues and they showed a concerted effort to rig the peer review process and marginalize dissent.
I feel the science is suspect and this has been promoted dishonestly for politics and ideology and there is scientific basis to question AGW. If you attended a convention of Catholic priests, would you expect you'd see an objective viewpoint on the existence of God if you polled them?
He's hardly alone, we can find a number of climate change researchers making problematic statements concerning the moral importance of convincing everyone their opinions are above reproach and must be accepted or the planet is doomed.
This was due equally to warming, largely due to agricultural practices (deforestation, irrigation, composting) which reduced the frequency and severity of the cyclical ice ages on Europe and Asia.
Social sciences note that that the poorest people: generally the people most exposed to pollution and untreated disease contribute most to over-population.
I have always been somewhat surprised that the majority of the population tend to reside on coastlines, considering we can't drink the water, and are most susceptible to extreme weather conditions.
Consists primarily of dead and surviving prisoners and of facilities used to kill and torture. By the 1800's, the study of this hysteria led some doctors to believe one person could have separately functioning personalities. The film chronicles Alex and four other conspiracy theorists, on their ceaseless quests to expose the "massive global conspiracy" that they believe threatens the future of humanity. If you try as hard as you possibly can to imagine the MOST UNAMERICAN, ANTI-FREEDOM, ANTI-DEMOCRACTIC way to be, it turns out to be your very own leaders.
Maybe more so because of all the educated scientists, engineers, demolition proffesionals and so on, that have been coming forward lately, and questioning the improbability of tower 1, 2 and 7 coming down as they did, than from the ?proof? that were there before.
If you haven't seen any of his stuff before then grab a pair of earplugs and let's get ready to rumble. He engages in mixing enough good journalism with bad journalism so that one is inclined to discredit ANYTHING he says.
So obviously they wouldn?t want anything stopping it?s in-flow of money, because some of their ?own? journalists are reporting that there are no WoMD in Iraq. Jones is ever going to taken seriously, he will have to start behaving like a serious and mature adult. It could certainly apply to the Pope dividing the world in 2 slices, The Line of Demarcation I believe it was, when Spain and Portugal were given the entire world. There?s a massive conspiracy being revealed every day by real journalists like Glenn Greenwald, John Pilger, Jeremy Scahill, the folks at Democracy Now and others. While you're doing your best to keep your version of the free world alive, the shadow governments are planning another attack on us, they use these attacks to promote their agendas and get us to want more government. I merely pointed out the role we've played in the history of shaping Europe in the midst of 2 world wars. Spain controlled territory west of the line, while Portugal controlled territory east of the line.
They show the Zapruder film they always stop it before the kill shot from the front and his head being Slung back as if hit in the forehead with a sledge hammer ashapens when you are hit in the forehead by a high powered round .Ask any hand to hand combat veteran which direction a person's head goes when hit from the Front.Whatcha think? In fact, being "christian", doesn't even mean particularly that you believe in everything the bible says, or the existence of an afterlife. They are Just power driven, cold, killers, trying to find a way to justify their actions, and to get attention for what they did. I'm no expert so correct me If I am wrong, but I don't think 50 years is long enough for the tree to be distinctly different in height. This is the type of **** were looking at in todays age only the stakes are higher and the prize is greater. Jones has is to diminish the credibility of legitimate issues by strengthening the "conspiracy theory" attack on those issues. I said, no TV Network was showing it live because no TV network would be filming the towers randomly.
Once done, you can follow the simple steps as given below, and start downloading all your favorite videos from Top Documentary Films to your computer.
Neaz succeeded to break away from the Taliban camp during the night, and hiked until he came to a police station where he turned himself in. The NATO-supported Afghan government is battling for the hearts and minds of this growing generation.
Recently, a video was posted to the Internet showing what's considered to be Taliban members reassuring one unenthusiastic, young suicide bomber. The United States did bomb Japan near the end of world war 2 but only to avoid having hundreds of thousands soldiers being killed in a war we did not start! Look I am not saying my government is so wonderful because I believe their policies are bad in many ways!
For instance, I think that anyone that would make kids like these sacrifice their lives like that deserve to be taken out and cruelly beaten to pulp.
The Koran recommends both the Bible and Jesus even though Jesus, in the Bible, claims to be more than the prophet that the Koran claims he is. Did our Universe just come into being by random chance, or was it created by a God who nurtures and sustains all life? Finding a way to travel backwards requires breaking the speed of light, which so far seems impossible. Using cutting-edge technology, scientists are now able to take a snapshot of the Universe a mere heartbeat after its birth. But since we can only see as far as light has traveled in that time, we can’t actually make out the edge of the universe. Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier for the first time, people argued it wasn’t possible for a plane to fly that fast. But these humanoid aliens were based soundly on Earth-based life, not any extraterrestrial evidence. Furthermore, a lot of these irrational self-confirming suppositions are old worn out yarns for that most AI enthusiasts don't take too seriously.
Other than that, i'll just say that all your 'god working with science' talk is strange to me.
The host or "dude" is Morgan Freeman, but neither is he condescending nor head of a skeptics' association. There is meaning to be found in making life better, easier, increasing human knowledge, pursuing things you find pleasurable. I studied, and gained a bit of knowledge, but I see myself as an id**t, that can't get my thumb out of my bum and actually do something with my life. Though I agree that anyone could reach the cream of their fields, but not become the cherry. Now rendered chaotic without the presence of its leader or any established government, Iraq's lack of cohesive identity made them vulnerable to a new and threatening insurgency. If you name your country, I will list their involvement in barbaric and inhuman transgressions over the last century (direct and by proxy). Also, I know that the citizens of your country are taught that blind patriotism is a positive trait, but in reality it serves only to reinforce the 'us vs them' dichotomy that is used to justify the atrocities committed by your government. Ah well, at least the land of the free isn't blocking all of Al Jazeraa like it was (trying) back in the day when it was the only one broadcasting the burning cities of 'free' Iraq. This is a great country full of freedom loving people of mixed races, ethnic and culture, biodiversity and we are trying to make this dream of freedom and harmony work. USA thinks it doesn't have to answer to anybody, Iraq was better off under Saddam full stop, but the US would rather have a puppet in every camp so they can drop depleted Uranium on innocents then walk away! We know that their humvees and a lot of their weapons were taken from the cowards who ran from them, but before that, there had to be someone funding them in a major way.
So what do the ordinary people think about climate change in relation to what scientists are trying to convey? Major changes in our climate may not as be as visible to us as fluctuations in our everyday weather.
So, if a global median temperature was several degrees lower, or even few degrees higher, what kind of weather change would that suggest? Modern science can actually determine the carbon levels in the atmosphere over recent centuries, but what can scientists tell us about climate variations in the very distant past? We see snapshots of a debate on TV throughout the documentary but every interview was with man-made climate change believers. They did not ascertain the position of the scientists who published over 66% of the papers. Cheap they are, when in the aftermath of tornadoes or hurricanes they suggest the victims of these disasters should blame themselves for it by cooking food for their babies, and lighting their homes so grandma doesn't fall and break her hip.
Your political ideologies will affect your work, and you have to put food on the table like anyone else, and are subject to things like greed, avarice, fame seeking, etc.
Our activities may be contributing to climate change but we aren't going to do anything significant to make any difference so let's just get on over populating, destroying habitats and doing what we are good at doing - stuffing up the planet. While I abhor such silliness I have to admit there are a lot of strange things surrounding his plane crash, including that the only two people on the ground with any technical authority over the locater beacon at the field, both killed themselves within weeks of the accident, in unrelated suicides. The "current situation" sees unprecedented attention and funding being directed toward their life's work, which would otherwise be an obscure and forgotten field. What then is so shocking, surprising and unthinkable about our destroying life and habitability on the planet with our co2 emissions? Finally you use the word "conspiracy theory" seemingly oblivious to the meaning of an ideological movement.
Question: If you had to make a prediction, what in your opinion will be the long term fall out, even if we started scaling back our emissions today? You want us to shut up while our country and our sovereignty and our borders and everything we've ever been and everything we'll ever be is being destroyed. They write thousands of text books and documents on it, but Alex Jones claims he's not the one who has this belief system in a New World Order.
It's not a wonderful beautiful place; it's a horrible place where the military industrial complex murdered the last real president in broad daylight in front of everyone. The Rumsfelds, Bushes, and all those other clinically psychotic (check it out) mass murderers, whose names you will paradoxicaly find in the list of Nobel Piece winners are as close to evil as you will find amongst real people.
Then I heard him described in another doc - which I can't recall right now - as a right-wing plant set upon us to subvert and distract. Then again, I'd imagine many in his audience also watch TV evangelists given there is some overlap and shared politics. We need all types of people and a guy who rallies against government is sorely needed at this time.
Then there is Limbaugh and the rest of the tea crowd, all with this, "if you knew what I knew" baloney. I don't know much about Ted Turner, but a billionaire giving away a third of his money to programs to help the poor would be seen by most people as a good thing. Mainstream "news" organisations have stopped doing journalism in favour of being stenographers for both political parties. The line was moved 800 miles further west with the signing of the Treaty of Tordesillas in 1494 a year later. A man made system also created to control people and turn them into slaves of their belief.
I am telling you these people have written books, they are not shy about their intentions, but they the way they do it, few will ever see their words. For example government based on "the divine right of kings" were once the rule and are now the exception. Life on the planet evolved without these elements so they are not recognized by our bodies as being harmful, in fact these radionuclides in the form of "hot particles" mimic elements such as calcium and potassium which are incorporated into our bones and organs and remain radioactive for hundreds or even thousands of years. The footage that was shown to us of the first plane wasn't submitted until the NEXT DAY via AMATEUR FOOTAGE.
Pro-Government propaganda materials are delivered to children in orphanages and schools around the country. It has been proven over and over that Iran exports terrorism through its so called democratic society! You may not reject these passages because if Allah is God he must have preserved them from corruption. It turns out we’re only just developing instruments powerful enough to scan for them, and science sophisticated enough to know where to look. Thirty years ago, scientists first realized that some unknown dark substance was affecting the way galaxies moved. Please when writing to me don't use appreviations like BB, this is beyand my way of understanding. The subject matter is so interesting on its own, that the use of a Holywood star to present it is totaly uneccessary and I feel cheapens the show, especially when he starts droaning on about his childhood complete with a video at the beginning of each episode. Another actor who not only believes in this stuff, but spreads his believes, is Dan Akroyd. Upon his death in a United States air strike, the snake of terrorism grew a new tail and called itself ISIL.
Their debates run throughout the course of the film, and their practical and ideological differences make for fascinating and enlightening viewing. Any of your fellow citizens who have the courage to stand up to the regime, and so face being demonized by both the media and brainwashed bigots, are not doing so because they hate their country, they are standing up for the country that they want the USA to become. Because it is making conflicts in the countries and supporting for violence there by promote them to terrorism and train them, fund them,protect them, do oil business with them,sell military weapons to them finally the US called them terrorist. KAT get a grip of reality love if there was a god America be the first place to pay for atrocities they are the biggest war monger in the world go check out they equipment isis uses, american tanks and hum v's american made munitions!
If they are rightly accusing the US of wrong doing then you would think that the most important population to view the film would be US citizens. It's time a new generation of people stands up and makes it clear too everybody, explaining people why we need too loose this part of our humanity! Too busy to actually take the time to learn about our "real" history but not too busy to deny it. These are all the people that were freed from all the prisons in the countries overthrown by the west in the last decade. So how do scientists document and assess global climate tendency, related to local weather changes? Most people knew about the ozone layer depletion but very few seem to know how that issue was settled.
And if we had higher atmospheric accumulation of C02 than we have today, what's the consequence for us? If we wipe ourselves out, the planet will return to normal, and die as it is supposed to, when the sun becomes a red giant, and torches us before converting into a white dwarf. The main point I was trying to express is that people need to forget the idea of 'saving the planet', and call it what it really is, saving ourselves.
This does not mean I am dismissing our poisoning of the biosphere, only that I have 'intellectual skepticism' regarding our knowledge of solar variation. If I want to save the planet, and you want to save the planet, and 37 guys at Berkeley and Stanford all want to save the planet, you don't think we all need to hold secret meetings to discuss how we're going to do this do you? I am of the mindset that re-forestation is our best alternative for reducing CO2 levels, (absorption) beyond technological innovation. Oh, yes, I was referring to 'population explosion' as opposed to a gradual increase in population. You got the nerve to call us traitors and call us conspiracy theorists just because we're informed. Not sure how much truth is in that argument but he does seem to have a bit more fondness for the "lizards" on the right. Times get hard and there is always some half wit that usually has no real convictions about anything, but making a buck.
Did you know that in June of this year, while people were protesting in the streets of Istanbul, CNN Turk was showing a penguin documentary? This is freedom from control we are not anyone's possession and these suppressors believe that we are work horses and there servants. But, Neaz and his friends know that life is more complex than what the propaganda advocates.
I am not saying the United States is perfect by any means going in for war after war for any reason because to me war is immoral! My country has some terrible foreign policies and we do have some of the worst politicians in the world. And then, Allah cannot be God because he recommends the Bible when the Bible shows Jesus to be more than the prophet that the Koran claims him to be. All it brought me was more grief and a bunch of nasty posts back and forth between me and those that supported the guy I jumped at, not to mention that guy himself getting all in a tissy and acting crazy.
While we are alive, is our only purpose in life to multiply by having offspring, and if so, what is that all about? Other than that, the content is intriguing and the show tries to be as balanced as possible.
It’s a well documented and easily accessed state that resides between full awakened consciousness and REM sleep. It is your kind of ignorant, flag-waving, intolerance that keeps the US stagnating in a mire of medieval values and, frankly, it is stinking up the rest of the world.
FreePress and freedom of speech is a dillusion you don't have any such things plenty of documentaries showing the US funding training and support of Terrorists are unplayable on us vpn's . Climate change is an even bigger scientific adventure and given the intricate nature of it we need to probably relearn the fundamentals of the science behind it. There is a ton of scientists out there who have not yet agreed with those on the political side of climate science.
What saddens me the most is the destruction of other life forms that we will be taking with us as we travel down the of extinct to join the 99 percent of life that ever existed on earth has done before us.
Our plant-based agriculture is a gross co2 emitter after you factor all the fossil applications involved. They'll skew the facts any way they see fit to advance their agenda and if they're wrong about climate change they're okay with that because they feel they're still working within the save the planet ideology. I am still convinced that there is a direct correlation between energy production, and the dramatic increase in human population.
He was a little too quick to express his admiration of the Ted Cruz publicity stunt a few days ago.
Ultimately I just disagree with people identifying and defining themselves under such parameters. His exuberance and passion is commendable, but his delivery is so hyper and chaotic that everything he tries to say comes across as totally unbelievable. The reason I ask is that the stats show Tea people and other far right people lack both education and and sophistication and get their news from only places that reaffirm their political 'belief systems'.
These guys to down kings to get where they are not by an honest living and doing the right thing like most of us regular everyday peasants.
The Afghan authorities claim that 48 kids were taken into custody last year for planning attacks.
Juste because you don't agree with something someone has to say (which seems to be ALL THE TIME) doesn't give you the right to belittle them.
Its not worth it, you can't win over the internet anyway- no way to get your hands around thier throat- so what's the point? I not only think that Morgan Freeman was great on these shows, but I too believe that he was the perfect candidate for them. It’s been around for thousands of years and cultures have sought it through hypnosis, meditation, drugs and many other means. Apparently they aren't hoping to effect any change with their film, but perhaps just hoping to get other countries to side with them against the US? I can write thousands of things too give this idea strenght, but I wont since ive haven't go all day (from pedofile priests too jihadi terrorists, too landstealing jewish settlers)! Aren't we going to bump into each other in instituitions, and online forums, and slap each other on the tookus agreeing with each other and squashing dissent? Perhaps our unwillingness to get off fossil fuels will prove this correct when it becomes far more difficult to acquire, and our number drop accordingly. Which is a shame, because if you can get past his drama filled, psycho- babble, screeching rants; what he is saying is the truth.
Hopefully you are young enough to still avail yourself of information from a much more creditable source that Jones. They are to me an evil cabal when they supress the advancement of the human race to maintain permanently an outdated and damaging system to uphold there own power and wealth despite the best interest of the people and the environment.
The large amounts of radionuclides are being bioaccumulated (biomagnified) into the ecosystem especially into the species at the top, humans included. I agree with you on many of the issues but I also think that Iran exports terrorism with some of their agents.Lets face it the world is run by rich bankers and corporations and many innocent people die because of money!
Everyone finds happiness in different ways and they don't need people like you telling them they're wrong or crazy or your ever so favorite word "hippies" It's people like you that makes this world so F'd up. I believe that most cultures throughout the world, especially in the "under developed" nations, also see their family elders in this fashion. I believe that ISIS is not being led by God but it is really in the grips of the antithesis of God. For me, this is always the underlying problem, and I am far from convinced that it can even be corrected, given the history of human nature.
And im not saying i agree with everything alex says but all u have to do is look at his history and u can see je has been talkin bout this stuff for years.
So for people who get all annoyed by the word evil maybe a better way to describe it would be to say that they are selfish and sociopathic to the core and have a thirst for power only equivalent to that of a maniac who want to rule the world only instead of straight up nuking everyone they use money as a weapon of persuasion to pull the required strings to achieve a desired action in the what ever system they are targeting. There has been no international cooperation to fix this problem or the other potentially catastrophic problems just waiting to happen at the Fukushima plants that are far from being under control.
My saying is in the next war politicians kids fight first then we will never have another war! That small amount of energy was the gravitational attraction the two plates had for each other, factoring in the gravitational influence of the earth’s mantle below the plates and the moon above the plates and any friction from whatever was supporting the plates.
We have welcomed Muslims and they live peacefully within our country unless they plan on doing violence to our citizens….we can't live with terrorism.
As an atheist, you learn there is no 1 version that explains all, there is no 1 trued, there is no 1 holy word, there is nothing that preaches hate! The idea of 'will and investment on a global scale' looks good on paper, but it is a long road between theory, and application. If anyone doubts this, how long do they think it would take for us to feel the effects if the sun just suddenly winked out? Seems so silly to me that people so stupidly over look money as the greatest of all weapons.
Dilution is not a solution to this problem which is what the all the atomic agencies are suggesting i.e. Believe me, all of us would rather have our people at home not risking their lives around the world to try to protect people from terrorism. Who is killing innocent women , children , wiping out a civilisation 7000 years old in Yemen ?
Where people no matter what they think , always respect eachother and will never turn too vilolence, even tho they disagree! Weapons can be anything that can be used against you and most people don't seem to realize that. Another large earthquake in the area will burst these tanks irradiating the site and the Pacific to an incredible level.
On Earth some have seen it with metal balls clumping together on a smoothly polished varnished floor and lasers emitting photons not being in absolutely 100 percent perfect alignment when they are fired horizontal to earth over long distances. Are not the killers , heathenistic Saudis who are wiping out Yemen only at your country's behest ? If we reach a planet wide idea that its religion together with inequality that is causing all our modern problems, we might overcome the problems we have ahead!
This interviewer unfortunately seems to be so convinced that the believers are correct that he wouldn't dare interview anyone with a contrary view.
The least controlled substance(money) is the most powerful tool to be used as a weapon of control and persuasion .
It was explained to me in big picture terms because I wanted to know how some machines worked but the people who told me knew their stuff in these areas. All of the mistakes made by the US are nothing compared to the mass violence done to us, our allies and all the innocent people murdered.
Could this be a deliberate terraforming of the Earth by the invading David Ike lizard creatures? There cannot possibly be an illuminati or NWO who are all powerful because they and their offspring will eventually all be poisoned too. Unless they have technology taken from crashed UFOs that can neutralize radioactive elements in their bodies. Seriously, can anyone explain how an all powerful group would allow the whole planet to be poisoned including themselves and their future offspring?
Some could suggest that evolution on earth is being "supercharged" (by aliens?) with the help of toxic radiation. The earth won't be a nice place for thousands of years but the end result may justify the means.

Survival techniques of early man evolution
Faraday cage lightning arrester manufacturers
American movie stars male names

Rubric: How To Survive Emp


    But the 5 ought to develop foil.
  2. sex_baby
    Their precise cause them in an location that is cool and sin??statement as the really basis of the P5+1 Talks.
  3. Dont_Danger
    Sufficient to get you by way would have been considerably much.
    Any federal agency, medical can retailer their meals and water.